§

The Academy of Magical Arts, Inc.

365 NLRB No. 101 (N.L.R.B. 2017)
The Academy of Magical Arts, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 709 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. New Process Steel v. N.L.R.B.

    560 U.S. 674 (2010)   Cited 141 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board cannot exercise its powers absent a lawfully appointed quorum

  3. Department of the Navy, Marine Corps Logistics Base v. Federal Labor Relations Authority

    962 F.2d 48 (D.C. Cir. 1992)   Cited 44 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Outlining FLRA position

  4. Bath Marine v. N.L.R.B

    475 F.3d 14 (1st Cir. 2007)   Cited 20 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Bath Iron Workers Pension Fund for Hourly Employers "is governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974"

  5. Chicago Tribune Co. v. N.L.R.B

    974 F.2d 933 (7th Cir. 1992)   Cited 21 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Ruling that where the contract defines the parties' rights as to mandatory subjects of bargaining, the contract will control

  6. Gratiot Community Hosp. v. N.L.R.B

    51 F.3d 1255 (6th Cir. 1995)   Cited 14 times

    Nos. 93-6533, 94-5023. Argued February 3, 1995. Decided April 21, 1995. Mark D. Nelson (argued and briefed), Catherine R. Giella (briefed), Keck, Mahin Cate, Chicago, IL, for petitioner cross-respondent. Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel (briefed), Frederick C. Havard (argued), Marilyn O'Rourke, N.L.R.B., Washington, DC, for respondent cross-petitioner. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; BROWN and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second