Terry Machine Co.

9 Cited authorities

Beaird-Poulan Division, Emerson, v. N.L.R.B
649 F.2d 589 (8th Cir. 1981) Cited 23 times
Reading the determinative factor in Georgetown Dress to be the lack of a professional organizer on the scene
St. Elizabeth Community Hosp. v. N.L.R.B
708 F.2d 1436 (9th Cir. 1983) Cited 19 times
In St. Elizabeth Community Hosp. v. NLRB, 708 F.2d 1436 (9th Cir. 1983), we upheld Board jurisdiction over a hospital affiliated with the Sisters of Mercy, a Catholic order.
Evergreen Healthcare, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
104 F.3d 867 (6th Cir. 1997) Cited 4 times
Nos. 95-6039/6193 Decided and Filed January 17, 1997 Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 24 David W. Miller (argued and briefed), Todd M. Nierman, Baker Daniels, Indianapolis, IN, for petitioner/cross-respondent. Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, Charles P. Donnelly, Jr. (briefed), William M. Bernstein, Steven F. Rappaport (argued), N.L.R.B., Appellate Court Branch, Washington, DC, for respondent cross-petitioner. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Doctors' Hospital of Modesto, Inc.
489 F.2d 772 (9th Cir. 1973) Cited 27 times
Accepting the Board's finding that registered nurses, who sometimes assigned and directed auxiliary personnel, were not supervisors
Wright Memorial Hosp. v. N.L.R.B., Region 17
771 F.2d 400 (8th Cir. 1985) Cited 13 times
In Wright Memorial Hospital v. NLRB, 771 F.2d 400 (8th Cir.1985), this court did say that the issue on appeal was whether “the Board abused its discretion” in overruling an employer's objections to an election and certifying a union.
N.L.R.B. v. Cal-Western Transport
870 F.2d 1481 (9th Cir. 1988) Cited 8 times
Addressing whether substantial evidence supports finding that supervisor's participation in campaign had coercive effect on employees
N.L.R.B. v. Hawaiian Flour Mill, Inc.
792 F.2d 1459 (9th Cir. 1986) Cited 5 times
Reasoning that a supervisor's "[t]alking to employees about the union, expressing personal views about the union, and answering questions about the union are permissible expressions of opinion when made in noncoercive and nonthreatening circumstances"
N.L.R.B. v. San Antonio Portland Cement Co.
611 F.2d 1148 (5th Cir. 1980) Cited 7 times
Wearing of union buttons is permissible statement of personal preference
N.L.R.B. v. Northeastern University
707 F.2d 15 (1st Cir. 1983) Cited 3 times
Indicating deference to Board's expressed need for confidentiality

Terry Machine Co.

9 Cited authorities

Reading the determinative factor in Georgetown Dress to be the lack of a professional organizer on the scene

In St. Elizabeth Community Hosp. v. NLRB, 708 F.2d 1436 (9th Cir. 1983), we upheld Board jurisdiction over a hospital affiliated with the Sisters of Mercy, a Catholic order.

Accepting the Board's finding that registered nurses, who sometimes assigned and directed auxiliary personnel, were not supervisors

In Wright Memorial Hospital v. NLRB, 771 F.2d 400 (8th Cir.1985), this court did say that the issue on appeal was whether “the Board abused its discretion” in overruling an employer's objections to an election and certifying a union.

Addressing whether substantial evidence supports finding that supervisor's participation in campaign had coercive effect on employees

Reasoning that a supervisor's "[t]alking to employees about the union, expressing personal views about the union, and answering questions about the union are permissible expressions of opinion when made in noncoercive and nonthreatening circumstances"

Wearing of union buttons is permissible statement of personal preference

Indicating deference to Board's expressed need for confidentiality