§
Tecnocap LLC

9 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."

  2. Dayton Newspapers, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    402 F.3d 651 (6th Cir. 2005)   Cited 21 times
    Contrasting lawfully speeding up a long-planned operational change due to union activity, with unlawfully "suddenly decid[ing] to find a way to cut back ... to spite the Union"

  3. King Soopers, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    859 F.3d 23 (D.C. Cir. 2017)   Cited 5 times

    No. 16-1316 C/w 16-1367 06-09-2017 KING SOOPERS, INC., Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent Raymond M. Deeny, Colorado Springs, CO, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Jonathon M. Watson, Denver, CO. Amy H. Ginn, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Richard F. Griffin, Jr., General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Robert

  4. Teamsters Local Union No. 639 v. N.L.R.B

    924 F.2d 1078 (D.C. Cir. 1991)   Cited 24 times
    Holding that brevity of parties' negotiations on issue and union's position that it still "had more movement to make" undermine employer's declaration of impasse

  5. Grinnell Fire Protection Systems v. N.L.R.B

    236 F.3d 187 (4th Cir. 2000)   Cited 12 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Noting that when, among other factors, a new negotiator was substituted, "the lack of a significant bargaining history would dictate giving the parties a fuller opportunity to effect an agreement than occurred here"

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Greensburg Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

    40 F.3d 669 (3d Cir. 1994)   Cited 17 times
    Holding that company, by insisting that bargaining agreement's recognition clause did not extend to part-time employees, had not "attempt[ed] to alter the bargaining unit but rather merely advanced its interpretation of the contractual language" and noting that "interpretation of the scope of the recognition clause" could be resolved in arbitration

  7. AMF Bowling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    63 F.3d 1293 (4th Cir. 1995)   Cited 9 times
    Explaining that an employer "may impose its own terms and conditions of employment unilaterally" after the lawful declaration of an impasse

  8. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,084 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

  9. Section 21-5G-1 - Definitions

    W. Va. Code § 21-5G-1   Cited 7 times

    As used in this article, the following terms have the following definitions: (a) The term "person" means any individual, proprietorship, partnership, firm, association, corporation, labor organization or any other legal entity. (b) The term "labor organization" means any organization, agency, union or employee representation committee of any kind, that exists, in whole or in part, to assist employees in negotiating with employers concerning grievances, labor disputes, wages, rates of pay, or other