Surface Industries, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,033 times   66 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
  2. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”
  3. D'Youville Manor, Lowell, Mass. v. N.L.R.B

    526 F.2d 3 (1st Cir. 1975)   Cited 16 times

    No. 75-1140. Argued September 10, 1975. Decided November 13, 1975. Reginald H. Howe, Boston, Mass., with whom John A. Perkins and Palmer Dodge, Boston, Mass., were on brief, for petitioner. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Washington, D.C., with whom Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Counsel, and John F. Depenbrock, Jr., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for respondent. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before COFFIN, Chief Judge

  4. Donovan v. N.L.R.B

    520 F.2d 1316 (2d Cir. 1975)   Cited 9 times
    Finding union members' mass picketing, threats, assaults and some property damage insufficient to sustain the "extraordinary sanction of withholding an otherwise appropriate remedial bargaining order"
  5. Scott-Gross Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    477 F.2d 64 (6th Cir. 1973)

    No. 72-1680. Argued April 10, 1973. Decided April 13, 1973. Samuel Milner, Lexington, Ky., Natalie S. Wilson, Eblen, Howard Milner, Lexington, Ky., on brief, for petitioner. John M. Flynn, N.L.R.B., Peter G. Nash, General Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Leonard M. Wagman, Stuart M. Rosenblum, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before PECK, McCREE

  6. United Bhd. of Carpenters, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    286 F.2d 533 (D.C. Cir. 1960)   Cited 8 times

    No. 15502. Argued September 22, 1960. Decided December 15, 1960. Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C., for petitioners. Duane B. Beeson, Atty., N.L.R.B., of the bar of the Supreme Court of California, Washington, D.C., pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., and Richard J. Scupi, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for respondent. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local 1016, United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America

    273 F.2d 686 (2d Cir. 1960)   Cited 4 times

    No. 57, Docket 25612. Argued November 16, 1959. Decided January 6, 1960. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Washington, D.C., Morton Namrow, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Jerome D. Fenton, General Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant General Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Richard O'C. Kehoe, Utica, N.Y. (Ferris, Kehoe Cardamone, Utica