§

Strauss Stores Corp.

94 N.L.R.B. 440 (N.L.R.B. 1951)
Strauss Stores Corp.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.

    312 U.S. 426 (1941)   Cited 504 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"

  2. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Colten

    105 F.2d 179 (6th Cir. 1939)   Cited 62 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Colten, 6 Cir., 105 F.2d 179, 183, it was said that "* * * the strife which is sought to be averted is no less an object of legislative solicitude when contract, death, or operation of law brings about change of ownership in the employing agency."

  4. National Labor Rel. Board v. Hopwood Retinning

    104 F.2d 302 (2d Cir. 1939)   Cited 41 times
    In NLRB v. Hopwood Retinning Co., 104 F.2d 302 (2d Cir. 1939), the employer had locked out and discharged employees because of their union activity.

  5. National Labor Rel. Board v. Thompson Products

    130 F.2d 363 (6th Cir. 1942)   Cited 20 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Thompson Products, 6 Cir., 130 F.2d 363, 368, this court pointed out that "the test, whether a challenged organization is employer controlled, is not an objective one but rather subjective, from the standpoint of employees."

  6. National Labor Rel. Board v. Weirton Steel Co.

    135 F.2d 494 (3d Cir. 1943)   Cited 17 times

    No. 8041. Argued March 15, 1943. Decided May 4, 1943. Appeal from National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce an order of the National Labor Relations Board against Weirton Steel Company. Decree enforcing order, as modified, entered. Ruth Weyand, of Washington, D.C. (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Associate Gen. Counsel, Howard Lichtenstein and Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Asst. Gen. Counsels, and Winthrop A. Johns, Malcolm A. Hoffmann, and

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Adel Clay Products Co.

    134 F.2d 342 (8th Cir. 1943)   Cited 13 times

    No. 12481. April 1, 1943. On Petition for the Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceedings by the National Labor Relations Board, petitioner, against Adel Clay Products Company, and others, respondents, for enforcement of petitioner's order against respondents. Order enforced. Russell Packard, Atty., National Labor Relations Board of Chicago, Ill., (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Associate Gen. Counsel, Howard Lichtenstein, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Louis

  8. National Labor Relations Bd. v. E.C. Brown Co.

    184 F.2d 829 (2d Cir. 1950)   Cited 6 times

    No. 16, Docket 21615. Argued October 5, 1950. Decided October 31, 1950. Gerald Krassa, Washington, D.C., David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, Owsley Vose and William Egan Colby, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., for the Board. William C. Combs, Rochester, N.Y., Frederick Thompson, Rochester, N.Y., for respondents, Richard B. Secrest, Rochester, N Y, of counsel. Before L. HAND, Chief Judge, and SWAN and CLARK,

  9. De Bardeleben v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    135 F.2d 13 (5th Cir. 1943)   Cited 2 times

    Nos. 10496, 10536. April 29, 1943. Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board, sitting at Washington, D.C. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board, sitting at Washington, D.C. Petition by Charles F. DeBardeleben individually, and another and Charles F. DeBardeleben and another, doing business as the Red Diamond Mining Company, to set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board and a petition by the National Labor Relations Board

  10. Wilson v. Cody Petroleum Co.

    66 F.2d 233 (10th Cir. 1933)   Cited 1 times

    No. 696. June 29, 1933. Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Wyoming; T. Blake Kennedy, Judge. In Equity. Suit by Sam A. Wilson against the Cody Petroleum Company, a corporation, and others. From a decree dismissing the action as against named defendant, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed. Jay H. Hoag, of Duluth, Minn. (Lathers Hoag and Theo. Hollister, all of Duluth, Minn., and Albert D. Walton, of Cheyenne, Wyo., on the brief), for appellant. William E. Mullen, of Cheyenne