§

Starbucks Corporation d/b/a Starbucks Coffee Company

360 N.L.R.B. 1168 (N.L.R.B. 2014)
Starbucks Corporation d/b/a Starbucks Coffee Company

6 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 356 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  2. Labor Board v. Fansteel Corp.

    306 U.S. 240 (1939)   Cited 281 times
    In Fansteel, the Board awarded reinstatement with backpay to employees who engaged in a "sit down strike" that led to confrontation with local law enforcement officials.

  3. W.F. Bolin Co. v. N.L.R.B

    70 F.3d 863 (6th Cir. 1995)   Cited 48 times
    Holding that an "inference of improper employer motivation" is permitted when an employer has terminated an employee who acted as a leader in making complaints to management on behalf of himself or others, or has organized workers on employment issues

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Starbucks Corp.

    679 F.3d 70 (2d Cir. 2012)   Cited 12 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Distinguishing between outbursts in public venues versus private spaces

  5. Boston Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. N.L.R.B

    692 F.2d 169 (1st Cir. 1982)   Cited 8 times
    Expressing reluctance "to adopt a rule that would permit the company to launder the `bad' motives of certain of its supervisors by forwarding a dispassionate report to a neutral superior"

  6. Marshall Field Co. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    200 F.2d 375 (7th Cir. 1953)   Cited 30 times
    Approving employer's banning of solicitors from selling areas when they acted in "loud and rowdy" manner