§

Standard Water Control Systems, Inc.

No. 78165757 (T.T.A.B. Mar. 30, 2005)
Standard Water Control Systems, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Quaker St. Oil Ref. Corp. v. Quaker Oil

    453 F.2d 1296 (C.C.P.A. 1972)   Cited 8 times
    Deciding the "right to registration" of the trademark "SUPER BLEND" based on the "factual situation" of concurrent use "as of the time when registration is sought"

  2. Application of Helena Rubinstein, Inc.

    410 F.2d 438 (C.C.P.A. 1969)   Cited 10 times

    Patent Appeal Nos. 8144, 8145. May 15, 1969. Laforest S. Saulsbury, New York City, attorney of record, for appellant. Joseph Schimmel, Washington, D.C., for the Commissioner of Patents. Jack E. Armore, Washington, D.C., of counsel. Before WORLEY, Chief Judge, McGUIRE, Judge, sitting by designation, and RICH, ALMOND and BALDWIN, Judges. ALMOND, Judge. We are confronted here with two separate appeals from a single decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board affirming the examiner's refusal to

  3. In re Bose Corp.

    546 F.2d 893 (C.C.P.A. 1976)   Cited 1 times

    Patent Appeal No. 76-581. December 16, 1976. Charles Hieken, Hieken Cohen, Waltham, Mass., atty. of record, for appellant. Joseph F. Nakamura, Washington, D.C., for the Commissioner of Patents; Fred W. Sherling, Washington, D.C., of counsel. Appeal from the Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. LANE, Judge. This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (board) affirming the refusal to register SYNCOM for loudspeaker

  4. Application of Universal Oil Products Co.

    476 F.2d 653 (C.C.P.A. 1973)   Cited 3 times

    Patent Appeal Nos. 8906 and 8933. April 19, 1973. John T. Lanahan, Des Plaines, Ill., of record, for appellant; Sidney W. Russell, Arlington, Va., of counsel. S. Wm. Cochran, Washington, D.C., for the Commissioner of Patents; John W. Dewhirst, Washington, D.C., of counsel. Appeal from the Patent Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, RICH, BALDWIN and LANE, Judges, and ALMOND, Senior Judge. RICH, Judge. These consolidated appeals are from decisions of the Patent Office

  5. Application of Bourns

    252 F.2d 582 (C.C.P.A. 1958)   Cited 3 times

    Patent Appeal No. 6355. February 18, 1958. Raymond W. Colton, Washington, D.C., for appellant. Clarence W. Moore, Washington, D.C., for the Commissioner of Patents. Before JOHNSON, Chief Judge, and O'CONNELL, WORLEY, and RICH, Judges. WORLEY, Judge. This is an appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, 111 U.S.P.Q. 351, affirming the action of the examiner in finally refusing registration on the Supplemental Register of appellant's alleged trademark for potentiometers consisting of

  6. Application of Compagnie Nat. Air France

    265 F.2d 938 (C.C.P.A. 1959)

    Patent Appeal No. 6424. April 22, 1959. Douglas H. Kenyon, New York City (Kenyon Kenyon, New York City, of counsel), for appellant. Clarence W. Moore, Washington, D.C., for Commissioner of Patents. Before WORLEY, Acting Chief Judge, and RICH, MARTIN, and JOHNSON, retired, Associate Judges. MARTIN, Acting Chief Judge. This is an appeal from a decision of the Commissioner of Patents, acting through the Assistant Commissioner, affirming the refusal of the Examiner of Trademarks to register "Sky-Room"

  7. Section 1051 - Application for registration; verification

    15 U.S.C. § 1051   Cited 3,838 times   124 Legal Analyses
    Requiring a filing of a Statement of Use to register a mark

  8. Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration

    15 U.S.C. § 1052   Cited 1,593 times   273 Legal Analyses
    Granting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"

  9. Section 1091 - Supplemental register

    15 U.S.C. § 1091   Cited 77 times
    Stating that marks registered on the Supplemental Register "must be capable of distinguishing the applicant's goods or services"

  10. Section 1191 - Definitions

    15 U.S.C. § 1191   Cited 69 times   1 Legal Analyses

    As used in this chapter- (a) The term "person" means an individual, partnership, corporation, association, or any other form of business enterprise. (b) The term "commerce" means commerce among the several States or with foreign nations or in any territory of the United States or in the District of Columbia or between any such territory and another, or between any such territory and any State or foreign nation, or between the District of Columbia or the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and any State or