§

St. Paul Park Refining Co. LLC d/b/a Andeavor

368 N.L.R.B. 62 (N.L.R.B. 2019)
St. Paul Park Refining Co. LLC d/b/a Andeavor

4 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 356 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  2. St. Paul Park Ref. Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    929 F.3d 610 (8th Cir. 2019)   Cited 1 times
    Noting that circumstantial evidence of departure from past practice can support inference as to motive

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Fermont

    928 F.2d 609 (2d Cir. 1991)   Cited 2 times

    No. 1075, Docket 90-4130. Argued February 28, 1991. Decided March 21, 1991. Marilyn O'Rourke, Washington, D.C. (Jerry M. Hunter, Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Howard E. Perlstein, Supervisory Atty., Peter D. Winkler, Robert N. Herman, Office of Gen. Counsel, John Truesdale, Office of Executive Secretary, Washington, D.C., Peter B. Hoffman, Office of the Director, Hartford, Conn., of counsel), for petitioner. Robert B. Mitchell

  4. Rule 803 - Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay-Regardless of Whether the Declarant Is Available as a Witness

    Fed. R. Evid. 803   Cited 12,886 times   85 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing exception to rule against hearsay for records of regularly conducted activities