St. Elizabeth Community Hospital

13 Cited authorities

Lemon v. Kurtzman
403 U.S. 602 (1971) Cited 2,348 times 23 Legal Analyses
Holding school-aid statute authorizing government inspection of parochial school records created an impermissible "intimate and continuing relationship between church and state" because it required the state "to determine which expenditures are religious and which are secular"
N.A.A.C.P. v. Button
371 U.S. 415 (1963) Cited 2,217 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that Virginia failed to "justify the broad prohibitions" imposed through a barratry law, but enjoining the statute only as applied to the politically oriented litigating efforts of the NAACP
Sherbert v. Verner
374 U.S. 398 (1963) Cited 2,073 times 9 Legal Analyses
Holding that governmental regulation that imposes a burden upon religious practice must be narrowly tailored to advance a compelling state interest
Shelton v. Tucker
364 U.S. 479 (1960) Cited 1,191 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that disclosure of every organization teachers had joined in the previous five years was not rationally related to the State's interest in determining their fitness and competency
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Catholic Bishop
440 U.S. 490 (1979) Cited 458 times 48 Legal Analyses
Holding that church-operated schools are not subject to NLRB jurisdiction
Thomas v. Collins
323 U.S. 516 (1945) Cited 884 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that a state may regulate labor unions but "[s]uch regulation ... must not trespass upon the domain set apart for ... free assembly"
Roemer v. Maryland Public Works Bd.
426 U.S. 736 (1976) Cited 270 times
Holding there was no excessive entanglement where State conducts annual audits to ensure that categorical state grants to religious colleges are not used to teach religion
Reynolds v. United States
98 U.S. 145 (1878) Cited 1,289 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the forfeiture doctrine requires a witness to be “absent by his [i.e., defendant's] own wrongful procurement”
McLaughlin v. Tilendis
398 F.2d 287 (7th Cir. 1968) Cited 151 times
Holding that under the Supremacy Clause, state tort immunity act would not shield defendants from liability because the cause of action was grounded on a federal statute, i.e. 42 U.S.C. § 1983
American Federation of State, County, & Municipal Employees v. Woodward
406 F.2d 137 (8th Cir. 1969) Cited 53 times
Holding that city could not fire employees because they joined a labor union, as “[u]nion membership is protected by the right of association under the First and Fourteenth Amendments”

St. Elizabeth Community Hospital

13 Cited authorities

Holding school-aid statute authorizing government inspection of parochial school records created an impermissible "intimate and continuing relationship between church and state" because it required the state "to determine which expenditures are religious and which are secular"

Holding that Virginia failed to "justify the broad prohibitions" imposed through a barratry law, but enjoining the statute only as applied to the politically oriented litigating efforts of the NAACP

Holding that governmental regulation that imposes a burden upon religious practice must be narrowly tailored to advance a compelling state interest

Holding that disclosure of every organization teachers had joined in the previous five years was not rationally related to the State's interest in determining their fitness and competency

Holding that church-operated schools are not subject to NLRB jurisdiction

Holding that a state may regulate labor unions but "[s]uch regulation ... must not trespass upon the domain set apart for ... free assembly"

Holding there was no excessive entanglement where State conducts annual audits to ensure that categorical state grants to religious colleges are not used to teach religion

Holding that the forfeiture doctrine requires a witness to be “absent by his [i.e., defendant's] own wrongful procurement”

Holding that under the Supremacy Clause, state tort immunity act would not shield defendants from liability because the cause of action was grounded on a federal statute, i.e. 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Holding that city could not fire employees because they joined a labor union, as “[u]nion membership is protected by the right of association under the First and Fourteenth Amendments”