§

Specialty Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center of Mobile

356 N.L.R.B. 289 (N.L.R.B. 2010)
Specialty Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center of Mobile

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bell Aerospace Co.

    416 U.S. 267 (1974)   Cited 757 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an agency is "not precluded from announcing new principles in an adjudicative proceeding"

  2. American Hospital Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    499 U.S. 606 (1991)   Cited 167 times
    Holding that statements in committee reports were not binding on the agency and do not "ha[ve] the force of law, for the Constitution is quite explicit about the procedure that Congress must follow in legislating"

  3. Pfaff v. U.S. Dept. of Housing

    88 F.3d 739 (9th Cir. 1996)   Cited 101 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "Congress chose to give special deference to government-imposed occupancy limits only . . . made no comparable provision for private occupancy policies"

  4. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 474 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    814 F.2d 697 (D.C. Cir. 1987)   Cited 87 times
    Holding that court need not sustain agency interpretation that was based, not on agency's judgment, but on its erroneous interpretation of statute

  5. Trustees of Masonic Hall Asylum Fund v. NLRB

    699 F.2d 626 (2d Cir. 1983)   Cited 9 times

    Nos. 299, 574, Dockets 82-4116, 82-4134. Argued November 19, 1982. Decided February 14, 1983. Frank C. Morris, Jr., New York City (Richard G. Vernon, Richard J. Reibstein, Epstein, Becker, Borsody Green, P.C., New York City, William W. Kelly, Penberthy, Kelly Walthall, Utica, N.Y., of counsel), for petitioner. David S. Fishback, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate

  6. Section 103.30 - Appropriate bargaining units in the health care industry

    29 C.F.R. § 103.30   Cited 13 times   5 Legal Analyses

    (a) This portion of the rule shall be applicable to acute care hospitals, as defined in paragraph (f) of this section: Except in extraordinary circumstances and in circumstances in which there are existing non-conforming units, the following shall be appropriate units, and the only appropriate units, for petitions filed pursuant to section 9(c)(1)(A)(i) or 9(c)(1)(B) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, except that, if sought by labor organizations, various combinations of units may also