SOLARCITY CORP.

10 Cited authorities

New Process Steel v. N.L.R.B.
560 U.S. 674 (2010) Cited 141 times 49 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Board cannot exercise its powers absent a lawfully appointed quorum
Morris v. Ernst & Young, LLP
834 F.3d 975 (9th Cir. 2016) Cited 147 times 52 Legal Analyses
Holding arbitration provisions mandating individual arbitration of employment-related claims violate the NLRA and fall within the FAA's saving clause
D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
737 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2013) Cited 141 times 145 Legal Analyses
Holding that an arbitration agreement that prohibited an employee from pursuing claims collectively did not violate the NLRA and must be enforced
Lewis v. Epic Sys. Corp.
823 F.3d 1147 (7th Cir. 2016) Cited 124 times 58 Legal Analyses
Holding that such waivers violate the Fair Labor Standards Act
Murphy Oil United States, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
808 F.3d 1013 (5th Cir. 2015) Cited 66 times 103 Legal Analyses
Upholding its earlier holding in D.R. Horton, Inc. v. NLRB , 737 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2013), that arbitration provisions mandating individual arbitration of employment-related claims do not violate the NLRA and are enforceable under the FAA
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Nursing
870 F.3d 113 (3d Cir. 2017) Cited 9 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Board applied the wrong legal standard where it "rel[ied] heavily on the fact that the [workers] did not frequently exercise their alleged supervisory power"
Guardsmark, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
475 F.3d 369 (D.C. Cir. 2007) Cited 16 times 2 Legal Analyses
Striking down rule that only allowed employees to complain internally
Cintas Corp. v. N.L.R.B
482 F.3d 463 (D.C. Cir. 2007) Cited 12 times 2 Legal Analyses
Upholding National Labor Relations Board determination that an employer's rule that was likely to chill employees' discussion of wages constituted an unfair labor practice under the NLRA
Section 1 - "Maritime transactions" and "commerce" defined; exceptions to operation of title
9 U.S.C. § 1 Cited 12,090 times 210 Legal Analyses
Defining the word "commerce" in the language of the Commerce Clause itself
Section 98 - Investigation of employee complaints
Cal. Lab. Code § 98 Cited 157 times 2 Legal Analyses
Providing that "[t]he Labor Commissioner may provide for a hearing in any action to recover wages, penalties, and other demands for compensation properly before the division or the Labor Commissioner, including orders of the Industrial Welfare Commission"

SOLARCITY CORP.

10 Cited authorities

Holding that the Board cannot exercise its powers absent a lawfully appointed quorum

Holding arbitration provisions mandating individual arbitration of employment-related claims violate the NLRA and fall within the FAA's saving clause

Holding that an arbitration agreement that prohibited an employee from pursuing claims collectively did not violate the NLRA and must be enforced

Holding that such waivers violate the Fair Labor Standards Act

Upholding its earlier holding in D.R. Horton, Inc. v. NLRB , 737 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2013), that arbitration provisions mandating individual arbitration of employment-related claims do not violate the NLRA and are enforceable under the FAA

Holding that the Board applied the wrong legal standard where it "rel[ied] heavily on the fact that the [workers] did not frequently exercise their alleged supervisory power"

Striking down rule that only allowed employees to complain internally

Upholding National Labor Relations Board determination that an employer's rule that was likely to chill employees' discussion of wages constituted an unfair labor practice under the NLRA

Defining the word "commerce" in the language of the Commerce Clause itself

Providing that "[t]he Labor Commissioner may provide for a hearing in any action to recover wages, penalties, and other demands for compensation properly before the division or the Labor Commissioner, including orders of the Industrial Welfare Commission"