SNC Manufacturing Co., Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 494 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."
  2. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”
  3. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of § 8 "whatever the employer's motive"
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Ralph Printing Lithographing Co.

    379 F.2d 687 (8th Cir. 1967)   Cited 28 times
    Recognizing that unfair labor practices claim against employer was subject to "the de minimis rule"
  5. N.L.R.B. v. Walton Manufacturing Company

    289 F.2d 177 (5th Cir. 1961)   Cited 32 times

    No. 18345. March 17, 1961. Russell Specter, Atty., N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Robert T. Thompson, Alexander E. Wilson, Jr., Wilson, Branch Barwick, J. Frank Ogletree, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before RIVES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges, and CHRISTENBERRY, District Judge. RIVES, Circuit Judge. This petition seeks enforcement

  6. Campbell Soup Company v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    380 F.2d 372 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 12 times
    In Campbell Soup Co. v. N.L.R.B., 380 F.2d 372 (5th Cir. 1967), we held invalid for vagueness and indefiniteness a ban on solicitation during "Company working hours."
  7. Mason Hanger-Silas Mason Co. v. N.L.R.B

    405 F.2d 1 (5th Cir. 1968)   Cited 6 times

    No. 25420. December 11, 1968. S. Tom Morris, Gibson, Ochsner, Harlan, Kinney Morris, Amarillo, Tex., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Williams, Michael N. Sohn, Attys., NLRB, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before RIVES and DYER, Circuit Judges, and MEHRTENS, District Judge. RIVES, Circuit Judge: Mason Hanger-Silas Mason Co., Inc. (Company herein) petitions, pursuant to 29 U.S.C.A. § 160(f)

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Idaho Potato Processors, Inc.

    322 F.2d 573 (9th Cir. 1963)

    No. 18390. September 17, 1963. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Lee M. Modjeska, and Glen Bendixsen, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Eli A. Weston, Boise, Idaho, for respondent. Before HAMLIN and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and KUNZEL, District Judge. KUNZEL, District Judge. Pursuant to Section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 U.S.C.A. § 160(e)), the National Labor