§

Sheet Metal Workers, Local 223

196 N.L.R.B. 55 (N.L.R.B. 1972)
Sheet Metal Workers, Local 223

8 Cited authorities

  1. National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    386 U.S. 612 (1967)   Cited 392 times
    Holding that union employees' refusal to install third-party manufacturer's product was not prohibited under § 158(b)(B), because it was an action "pressuring the [union members'] employer for agreements regulating relations between [the employer] and his own employees"

  2. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    341 U.S. 694 (1951)   Cited 246 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the prohibition of picketing in furtherance of unlawful objectives is not an abridgement of free speech

  3. Orange Belt Dist. Coun. of Ptrs. v. N.L.R.B

    328 F.2d 534 (D.C. Cir. 1964)   Cited 56 times

    No. 17388. Argued November 6, 1963. Decided January 30, 1964. Mr. Herbert M. Ansell, Washington, D.C., of the bar of the Supreme Court of California, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, for petitioners. Mr. Herbert S. Thatcher, Washington, D.C., was on the brief for petitioners. Mr. David Barr, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for petitioners. Mr. Hans J. Lehmann, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board

  4. American Boiler Manufacturers v. N.L.R.B

    366 F.2d 815 (8th Cir. 1966)   Cited 21 times
    In American Boiler, the complaint alleged a fabrication clause in a collective-bargaining contract was being unlawfully applied by the parties, but the issue of legality of the clause was not passed on by the Board, even though the validity of the clause would be dispositive and was fully litigated by the parties; this Court remanded to the Board to determine the legality of the clause.

  5. American Boiler Manufacturers v. N.L.R.B

    404 F.2d 547 (8th Cir. 1969)   Cited 18 times

    No. 19033. December 6, 1968. Rehearing En Banc Denied January 21, 1969. Rehearing Denied January 29, 1969. Kenneth C. McGuiness, of Vedder, Price, Kaufman, Kammholz McGuiness, Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Stanley R. Strauss, Washington, D.C., on brief and reply brief. Leonard M. Wagman, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Gary Green, Atty

  6. Local Union No. 98 v. N.L.R.B

    433 F.2d 1189 (D.C. Cir. 1970)   Cited 6 times

    No. 22691. Argued December 8, 1969. Decided June 18, 1970. Mr. Mortimer Riemer, Cleveland, Ohio, with whom Mr. Edward J. Hickey, Washington, D.C., Jr., was on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. Glen M. Bendixsen, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, were on the brief, for respondent. Mr. Arnold Morelli, Cincinnati, Ohio, for intervenor. Before WRIGHT, TAMM and

  7. National Labor Relations B. v. Local U. N. 141

    425 F.2d 730 (6th Cir. 1970)   Cited 4 times

    No. 19830. May 5, 1970. Roger L. Sabo, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, John I. Taylor, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Robert I. Doggett, Cincinnati, Ohio, for respondent; Smith, Latimer, Doggett Swing, Cincinnati, Ohio, on brief. Bauer Morelli, Arnold Morelli, Cincinnati, Ohio, on brief for intervenor. Before PECK, COMBS, and BROOKS, Circuit Judges.

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Washington-Oregon

    211 F.2d 149 (9th Cir. 1954)   Cited 17 times

    No. 13768. March 8, 1954. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Bernard Dunau, James A. Ryan, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Wettrick, Flood O'Brien, George E. Flood, George O. Toulouse, Jr., Seattle, Wash., Francis X. Ward, Indianapolis, Ind., for respondent. Before DENMAN, Chief Judge, and HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges. DENMAN, Chief Judge. The National Labor Relations Board, hereafter the