§

Service Employees Local 254 (Brandeis University)

332 N.L.R.B. 1118 (N.L.R.B. 2000)
Service Employees Local 254 (Brandeis University)

19 Cited authorities

  1. Litton Financial Printing Division v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    501 U.S. 190 (1991)   Cited 794 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that where a court must determine the validity of an arbitration agreement, it "cannot avoid that duty" just because the court must decide an issue on the merits

  2. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    460 U.S. 693 (1983)   Cited 309 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

  3. Finnegan v. Leu

    456 U.S. 431 (1982)   Cited 298 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that status as a union employee or appointed officer is not a membership right within a union and is not protected by the LMRDA

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.

    388 U.S. 175 (1967)   Cited 334 times
    Holding that majority rule concept is at the center of federal labor policy

  5. Sheet Metal Workers v. Lynn

    488 U.S. 347 (1989)   Cited 165 times
    Holding that removal of an elected union official by a trustee because the official opposed a proposed dues increase was a violation of Title I of the LMRDA

  6. Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 556 (1978)   Cited 196 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity

  7. Steelworkers v. Sadlowski

    457 U.S. 102 (1982)   Cited 168 times
    Holding that "union's decision to adopt an rule does not involve state action"

  8. Boilermakers v. Hardeman

    401 U.S. 233 (1971)   Cited 184 times
    Holding that secion 412 of the LMRDA explicitly vests district courts with jurisdiction over LMRDA claims

  9. Machinists v. Gonzales

    356 U.S. 617 (1958)   Cited 256 times
    Holding that state contract claim was not preempted because it was internal to the union and not subject to regulation under the NLRA

  10. Emporium Capwell Co. v. Western Addition Community Organization

    420 U.S. 50 (1975)   Cited 125 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that wildcat strikers are bargaining separately and are therefore not protected by the NLRA

  11. Section 411 - Bill of rights; constitution and bylaws of labor organizations

    29 U.S.C. § 411   Cited 1,745 times
    Providing that exhausting a union's contractual remedies is a prerequisite to filing a civil action