§

Serendippity-Un-Ltd. and Tigerrr, Inc.

263 N.L.R.B. 768 (N.L.R.B. 1982)
Serendippity-Un-Ltd. and Tigerrr, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  2. Abilities and Goodwill, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    612 F.2d 6 (1st Cir. 1979)   Cited 22 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Listing factors to be considered when determining whether concerted action is protected

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Ben Pekin Corp.

    452 F.2d 205 (7th Cir. 1971)   Cited 30 times

    No. 18894. October 4, 1971. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Janet Skaare Morris, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Herman M. Levy, Atty., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Harold A. Katz, Irving M. Friedman, Charles Barnhill, Jr., Zenia S. Goodman, Chicago, Ill., Katz Friedman, Chicago, Ill., for respondent. Before HASTINGS, Senior Circuit Judge, and KERNER and SPRECHER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This application by the

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Modern Carpet Industries, Inc.

    611 F.2d 811 (10th Cir. 1979)   Cited 8 times

    No. 78-1749. Argued November 27, 1979. Decided December 28, 1979. Edward S. Dorsey, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Andrew F. Tranovich, John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N. L. R. B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Sam Sexton, Jr., Fort Smith, Ark., for respondent. Before DOYLE and McKAY, Circuit Judges, and BROWN, District Judge. Of the District of

  5. Section 144 - Separability

    29 U.S.C. § 144   Cited 11 times   1 Legal Analyses

    If any provision of this chapter, or the application of such provision to any person or circumstance, shall be held invalid, the remainder of this chapter, or the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid, shall not be affected thereby. 29 U.S.C. § 144 June 23, 1947, ch. 120, title V, §503, 61 Stat. 162.