Seattle Real Estate Board

9 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Laughlin

    301 U.S. 1 (1937)   Cited 1,497 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the National Labor Relations Act applied only to interstate commerce, and upholding its constitutionality on that basis
  2. Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.

    317 U.S. 564 (1943)   Cited 592 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that goods ordered by a wholesaler based on anticipation of need, as opposed to "pursuant to a prior order, contract, or understanding," may no longer be traveling in interstate commerce when delivered to the wholesaler's in-state customers for purposes of the Fair Labor Standards Act
  3. Labor Board v. Fainblatt

    306 U.S. 601 (1939)   Cited 281 times
    Upholding NLRA under Commerce Power
  4. Mabee v. White Plains Pub. Co.

    327 U.S. 178 (1946)   Cited 179 times
    Finding that a newspaper, with one-half of one percent of its circulation regularly out of state, is engaged in interstate commerce
  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Darlington Veneer

    236 F.2d 85 (4th Cir. 1956)   Cited 16 times

    No. 7194. Argued June 15, 1956. Decided August 20, 1956. Irving M. Herman, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel; David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel; Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. P. Dalton Kennedy, Jr., Charlotte, N.C., for respondent. Before PARKER, Chief Judge, SOPER, Circuit Judge, and BARKSDALE, District Judge. PARKER

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Shawnee Milling Co.

    184 F.2d 57 (10th Cir. 1950)   Cited 9 times

    No. 3906. August 4, 1950. A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, and Abraham H. Maller, Washington, D.C., on the brief) for petitioner. Kenneth Abernathy, Shawnee, Okla. (G.C. Abernathy, Shawnee, Okla., on the brief) for respondent. Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and HUXMAN, Circuit Judges. HUXMAN, Circuit Judge. This is a conventional proceeding under Section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Board Act, 29 U.S.C

  7. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,086 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"
  8. Section 152 - Definitions

    29 U.S.C. § 152   Cited 3,207 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Defining a supervisor to include “any individual having authority . . . to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or responsibly to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend such action, if in connection with the foregoing the exercise of such authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment”
  9. Section 215 - Prohibited acts; prima facie evidence

    29 U.S.C. § 215   Cited 2,696 times   50 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing as a protected activity an individual's “testif[ying] ... in any such proceeding” “under or related to this chapter”