§

Sears, Roebuck and Co.

368 NLRB No. 30 (N.L.R.B. 2019)
Sears, Roebuck and Co.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Brooks v. Labor Board

    348 U.S. 96 (1954)   Cited 299 times
    Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board

  2. In re Steinhardt Partners, L.P.

    9 F.3d 230 (2d Cir. 1993)   Cited 243 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that voluntary production of privileged documents to an adversary waives privilege

  3. Vincent Industrial Plastics, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    209 F.3d 727 (D.C. Cir. 2000)   Cited 44 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Vincent Industrial, we directed the Board to premise every bargaining order on an "explicit[ balanc[ing][of] three considerations: (1) the employees' Section 7 rights [ 29 U.S.C. § 157]; (2) whether other purposes of the [NLRA] override the rights of employees to choose their bargaining representatives; and (3) whether alternative remedies are adequate to remedy the violations of the [NLRA]]."

  4. Lee Lumber & Building Material Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    117 F.3d 1454 (D.C. Cir. 1997)   Cited 27 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Noting that, "[b]ecause affirmative bargaining orders interfere with the employee free choice that is a core principle of the Act," we "view them with suspicion" and demand special justification for them

  5. Exxel/Atmos, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    28 F.3d 1243 (D.C. Cir. 1994)   Cited 28 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Stressing appropriateness of bargaining order to remedy bad faith bargaining during certification year

  6. Chelsea Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    285 F.3d 1073 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 8 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 00-1443. Argued November 1, 2001. Decided April 12, 2002. Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Donald H. Scharg argued the cause for petitioner. On the briefs were Steven J. Fishman and Thomas A. Pinch. Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel

  7. Lee Lumber and Bldg. Material v. N.L.R.B

    310 F.3d 209 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 5 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Stating that this court "`review the Board's factual conclusions' only for `substantial evidence,' and must `uphold the Board's application of law to facts unless arbitrary or otherwise erroneous'" (quoting Harter Tomato Products Co. v. NLRB, 133 F.3d 934, 937 (D.C. Cir. 1998))

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Georgia Rug Mill

    308 F.2d 89 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 22 times

    No. 19223. September 18, 1962. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Frank A. Constangy, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before BROWN, WISDOM and BELL, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order that the respondent, Georgia Rug Mill, cease violating Section 8(a)(1) of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. §

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Gold Standard Ent., Inc.

    607 F.2d 1208 (7th Cir. 1979)   Cited 4 times
    In Gold Standard Enterprises, this court discussed in some detail the analysis of "credibility" articulated by Judge Wallace in Penasquitos Village, Inc. v. NLRB, 565 F.2d 1074 (9th Cir. 1977).