§

Schnell Tool & Die Corp.

162 N.L.R.B. 1313 (N.L.R.B. 1967)
Schnell Tool & Die Corp.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 730 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  2. Textile Workers v. Darlington Co.

    380 U.S. 263 (1965)   Cited 168 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has the absolute right, at least as far as the NLRA is concerned, to terminate his entire business for any reason

  3. Telegraphers v. Chicago N.W. R. Co.

    362 U.S. 330 (1960)   Cited 140 times
    Holding that a union's demand that no existing position be abolished except by agreement between employer and union is a "labor dispute" under Norris-LaGuardia

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Royal Plating Polishing Co.

    350 F.2d 191 (3d Cir. 1965)   Cited 43 times
    In NLRB v. Royal Plating Polishing Co., Inc., 350 F.2d 191, 196 (3d Cir. 1965), the court characterized a company's decision to close a plant when "faced with the economic necessity of either moving or consolidating the operations of a failing business" as a "management decision which [is] fundamental to the basic direction of a corporate enterprise" and which lies "at the core of entrepreneurial control.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Schnell Tool Die Corporation

    359 F.2d 39 (6th Cir. 1966)   Cited 8 times

    No. 16163. April 27, 1966. Nancy Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Margaret M. Farmer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief. Harry S. Manchester and C. Kenneth Clark, Jr., Youngstown, Ohio, for respondents, Harrington, Huxley Smith, Youngstown, Ohio, on the brief. Before EDWARDS, Circuit Judge, BROWN, District Judge, and GREEN, District Judge. Honorable