San Francisco-Oakland Mailers' Union 18

7 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.

    388 U.S. 175 (1967)   Cited 334 times
    Holding that majority rule concept is at the center of federal labor policy
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Industrial Union of Marine & Shipbuilding Workers of America

    391 U.S. 418 (1968)   Cited 215 times
    Holding that union could not expel member because he filed unfair labor practice charge against it without first exhausting internal remedies as provided in union constitution
  3. Hughes Tool Co. v. National Labor Relations Bd.

    147 F.2d 69 (5th Cir. 1945)   Cited 60 times
    In Hughes Tool Co. v. NLRB, 147 F.2d 69 (5th Cir. 1945), the court dealt with a prior version of § 9(a) which did not expressly guarantee the Union's right to be present at the adjustment of grievances. Nevertheless, the court found that such a right existed, and stated that it could be waived.
  4. Timken Roller Bearing v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    161 F.2d 949 (6th Cir. 1947)   Cited 31 times
    In Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 6 Cir., 161 F.2d 949, relied upon by plaintiff, arbitrability of the question of contracting out work was recognized as an interpretation of a management function clause of the agreement there involved.
  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Taormina

    207 F.2d 251 (5th Cir. 1953)   Cited 16 times

    No. 14362. September 17, 1953. Ruth V. Reel, Atty., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, Elizabeth W. Weston, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Scott Toothaker, McAllen, Tex., Ewers, Cox Toothaker, McAllen, Tex., of counsel, for respondents. Before HOLMES, BORAH, and RIVES, Circuit Judges. BORAH, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order of May 29, 1951, requiring respondents

  6. Square D Company v. N.L.R.B

    332 F.2d 360 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 2 times

    No. 18700. May 4, 1964. Foley, Sammond Lardner, James I. Poole, Milwaukee, Wis., for petitioner. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Davison and Margaret M. Farmer, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before POPE, MERRILL and BROWNING, Circuit Judges. MERRILL, Circuit Judge. This case is before the court on petition of Square D Company (herein called the Company) to review and set aside an order

  7. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,086 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"