§

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. v. Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP

13198568 (P.T.A.B. Dec. 10, 2014)
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. v. Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP

13 Cited authorities

  1. Kyocera Wireless v. I.T.C

    545 F.3d 1340 (Fed. Cir. 2008)   Cited 118 times   15 Legal Analyses
    Finding public accessibility when the reference was contained in a book sold to the public

  2. In re Klopfenstein

    380 F.3d 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2004)   Cited 76 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that whether a reference is publicly accessible is based on the “facts and circumstances surrounding the reference's disclosure to members of the public”

  3. SRI International, Inc. v. Internet Security Systems, Inc.

    511 F.3d 1186 (Fed. Cir. 2008)   Cited 53 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that paper on FTP website, while publicly available, was not publicly accessible because it was “not catalogued or indexed in a meaningful way”

  4. In re Lister

    583 F.3d 1307 (Fed. Cir. 2009)   Cited 36 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a reference archived in an on-line database searchable by keyword qualified as printed publication

  5. Bruckelmyer v. Ground Heaters, Inc.

    445 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2006)   Cited 38 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that figures within the prosecution history file in the Canadian patent office but not part of the issued patent were publicly accessible and thus a printed publication

  6. Suffolk Technologies, LLC v. AOL Inc.

    752 F.3d 1358 (Fed. Cir. 2014)   Cited 18 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that alterations of time stamps and email addresses in a reproduction of a newsgroup post asserted as prior art were insufficient to create a genuine issue of material fact concerning the post

  7. Section 102 - Conditions for patentability; novelty

    35 U.S.C. § 102   Cited 5,973 times   986 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting the grant of a patent to one who "did not himself invent the subject matter sought to be patented"

  8. Section 120 - Benefit of earlier filing date in the United States

    35 U.S.C. § 120   Cited 598 times   109 Legal Analyses
    Granting an earlier priority date to later applications for inventions that were disclosed in a previous application

  9. Section 311 - Inter partes review

    35 U.S.C. § 311   Cited 403 times   188 Legal Analyses
    Establishing grounds and scope of IPR proceeding

  10. Section 314 - Institution of inter partes review

    35 U.S.C. § 314   Cited 374 times   630 Legal Analyses
    Directing our attention to the Director's decision whether to institute inter partes review "under this chapter" rather than "under this section"

  11. Section 119 - Benefit of earlier filing date; right of priority

    35 U.S.C. § 119   Cited 269 times   70 Legal Analyses
    Governing claiming priority to an earlier-filed provisional application

  12. Section 42.107 - Preliminary response to petition

    37 C.F.R. § 42.107   Cited 94 times   56 Legal Analyses
    Requiring initiation of IPR within six months of filing and a decision within twelve months thereafter

  13. Section 42.108 - Institution of inter partes review

    37 C.F.R. § 42.108   Cited 45 times   69 Legal Analyses
    Permitting partial institution