§

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. v Fractus, S.A.

10963080 (P.T.A.B. Feb. 26, 2014)
Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. v Fractus, S.A.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Carr v. U.S.

    560 U.S. 438 (2010)   Cited 279 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because SORNA "sets forth [its] travel requirement in the present tense," the statute's criminal penalties do not apply to a person whose interstate travel predated enactment

  2. Frederick v. Shinseki

    684 F.3d 1263 (Fed. Cir. 2012)   Cited 8 times
    In Frederick, we found that the surviving spouse fell into the first group; here, the Veterans Court essentially determined that Mrs. Carroll falls into the second group and, similar to Mrs. Frederick, is therefore ineligible for DIC benefits because she did not submit her application for benefits within the one-year filing window of § 101(e).

  3. Section 315 - Relation to other proceedings or actions

    35 U.S.C. § 315   Cited 544 times   889 Legal Analyses
    Permitting the Director to consolidate separate IPRs challenging the same patent

  4. Section 42.71 - Decision on petitions or motions

    37 C.F.R. § 42.71   Cited 22 times   44 Legal Analyses

    (a)Order of consideration. The Board may take up petitions or motions for decisions in any order, may grant, deny, or dismiss any petition or motion, and may enter any appropriate order. (b)Interlocutory decisions. A decision on a motion without a judgment is not final for the purposes of judicial review. If a decision is not a panel decision, the party may request that a panel rehear the decision. When rehearing a non-panel decision, a panel will review the decision for an abuse of discretion. A

  5. Section 42.101 - Who may petition for inter partes review

    37 C.F.R. § 42.101   Cited 7 times   10 Legal Analyses

    A person who is not the owner of a patent may file with the Office a petition to institute an inter partes review of the patent unless: (a) Before the date on which the petition for review is filed, the petitioner or real party-in-interest filed a civil action challenging the validity of a claim of the patent; (b) The petition requesting the proceeding is filed more than one year after the date on which the petitioner, the petitioner's real party-in-interest, or a privy of the petitioner is served