13 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.
356 U.S. 342 (1958) Cited 296 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."
Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.
351 U.S. 149 (1956) Cited 223 times 8 Legal AnalysesHolding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith
Canning v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
705 F.3d 490 (D.C. Cir. 2013) Cited 96 times 37 Legal AnalysesHolding that such a challenge qualifies as an "extraordinary circumstance"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. New Vista Nursing & Rehab.
719 F.3d 203 (3d Cir. 2013) Cited 28 times 4 Legal AnalysesHolding that “ ‘the Recess of the Senate’ means only intersession breaks,” and, therefore, “that [Board] Member Becker's appointment was invalid”
Laurel Baye Healthcare of Lake Lanier, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
564 F.3d 469 (D.C. Cir. 2009) Cited 30 times 2 Legal AnalysesHolding that two-member NLRB cannot issue decisions
Regal Cinemas, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
317 F.3d 300 (D.C. Cir. 2003) Cited 30 timesAffirming the Board's finding of a Section 8 violation where the layoff was motivated by labor costs rather than technological advances
Gratiot Community Hosp. v. N.L.R.B
51 F.3d 1255 (6th Cir. 1995) Cited 14 timesNos. 93-6533, 94-5023. Argued February 3, 1995. Decided April 21, 1995. Mark D. Nelson (argued and briefed), Catherine R. Giella (briefed), Keck, Mahin Cate, Chicago, IL, for petitioner cross-respondent. Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel (briefed), Frederick C. Havard (argued), Marilyn O'Rourke, N.L.R.B., Washington, DC, for respondent cross-petitioner. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before: MERRITT, Chief Judge; BROWN and BATCHELDER, Circuit Judges
West Penn Power Co. v. N.L.R.B
394 F.3d 233 (4th Cir. 2005) Cited 4 timesNos. 03-1984, 03-2139. Argued: June 3, 2004. Decided: January 12, 2005. Petition for review of National Labor Relations Board. ARGUED: John Clark Unkovic, Reed Smith, L.L.P., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for West Penn Power Company, Potomac Edison Power Company, and Allegheny Energy Service Corporation. Joan Elizabeth Hoyte, Office of the General, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for the Board. Burton E. Rosenthal, Segal, Roitman Coleman, Boston, Massachusetts, for Intervenor. ON BRIEF:
N.L.R.B. v. Middleboro Fire Apparatus, Inc.
590 F.2d 4 (1st Cir. 1978) Cited 17 timesNo. 78-1173. Argued October 4, 1978. Decided December 20, 1978. Alan Banov, Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and Peter M. Bernstein, Atty., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Lawrence M. Siskind, Brockton, Mass., with whom Ann-Louise Levine, Brockton, Mass., was on brief, for respondent. Petition from National Labor
Iowa Beef Packers, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
331 F.2d 176 (8th Cir. 1964) Cited 32 timesGiving false testimony at hearing on unfair labor practice charge; unfair labor practice
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,084 times 34 Legal AnalysesFinding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"