Roegelein Provision Co.

3 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. C & C Plywood Corp.

    385 U.S. 421 (1967)   Cited 117 times
    Holding that the NLRB has the authority to interpret CBAs in the first instance where its interpretation is for the purpose of “enforc[ing] a statutory right which Congress considered necessary to allow labor and management to get on with the process of reaching fair terms and conditions of employment”
  2. Quality Castings Company v. N.L.R.B

    325 F.2d 36 (6th Cir. 1963)   Cited 6 times

    No. 15223. December 7, 1963. Charles R. Iden, Akron, Ohio, Brouse, McDowell, May, Bierce Wortman, Akron, Ohio, on brief, for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Allen I. Mendelsohn, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for respondent. Before O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge, and KALBFLEISCH and PECK, District Judges. KALBFLEISCH, District Judge. The Quality Castings

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Natl. Seal

    336 F.2d 781 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 2 times

    No. 19054. November 6, 1964. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Marion Griffin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Roderick M. Hills, Munger, Tolles, Hills Olson, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. Before BARNES and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges, and McNICHOLS, District Judge. McNICHOLS, District Judge. The National Labor Relations Board has petitioned this Court for enforcement of its order