Rigid Pak, Corp.

10 Cited authorities

Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board
379 U.S. 203 (1964) Cited 730 times 7 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA
Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 709 times 29 Legal Analyses
Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
460 U.S. 693 (1983) Cited 309 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights
First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
452 U.S. 666 (1981) Cited 268 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons
H. K. Porter Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
397 U.S. 99 (1970) Cited 222 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that the NLRB is "without power to compel a company or a union to agree to any substantive contractual provision of a collective-bargaining agreement."
Genetics Institute, Inc. v. Amgen, Inc.
502 U.S. 856 (1991) Cited 80 times
Holding that Connecticut's overtime wage law is not preempted by FLSA
Penntech Papers, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
706 F.2d 18 (1st Cir. 1983) Cited 121 times
Holding that same day notice was inadequate where company failed to bargain in good faith after the closure
St. George Warehouse, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
420 F.3d 294 (3d Cir. 2005) Cited 36 times 1 Legal Analyses
Explaining that under a substantial evidence standard of review, an administrative fact-finder's determinations on issues of credibility should not be reversed unless inherently incredible or patently unreasonable
Regal Cinemas, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
317 F.3d 300 (D.C. Cir. 2003) Cited 30 times
Affirming the Board's finding of a Section 8 violation where the layoff was motivated by labor costs rather than technological advances
Olivetti Office U.S.A., Inc. v. N.L.R.B
926 F.2d 181 (2d Cir. 1991) Cited 25 times
Denying enforcement of Board order that would serve no legitimate purpose

Rigid Pak, Corp.

10 Cited authorities

Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons

Holding that the NLRB is "without power to compel a company or a union to agree to any substantive contractual provision of a collective-bargaining agreement."

Holding that Connecticut's overtime wage law is not preempted by FLSA

Holding that same day notice was inadequate where company failed to bargain in good faith after the closure

Explaining that under a substantial evidence standard of review, an administrative fact-finder's determinations on issues of credibility should not be reversed unless inherently incredible or patently unreasonable

Affirming the Board's finding of a Section 8 violation where the layoff was motivated by labor costs rather than technological advances

Denying enforcement of Board order that would serve no legitimate purpose