Reeder Motor Co.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat. Licorice Co. v. Labor Bd.

    309 U.S. 350 (1940)   Cited 314 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that requiring employees to sign individual contracts waiving their rights to self-organization and collective bargaining violates § 8 of the NLRA
  2. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 269 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8
  3. H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 514 (1941)   Cited 241 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.
  4. Labor Board v. Crompton Mills

    337 U.S. 217 (1949)   Cited 102 times
    Holding unlawful unilateral changes significantly different from "any which the employer has proposed" during bargaining
  5. Labor Board v. Newport News Co.

    308 U.S. 241 (1939)   Cited 119 times
    Upholding finding of domination where company determined structure of organization and could choose whether to adopt recommendations
  6. Allis-Chalmers Mfg. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    162 F.2d 435 (7th Cir. 1947)   Cited 18 times
    In Allis-Chalmers the employer downgraded the status of plant inspectors after they had voted to join a union, and it was apparent that the employer acted only because of the inspectors' membership in the union.
  7. Gullett Gin Co. v. National Labor Rel. Board

    179 F.2d 499 (5th Cir. 1950)   Cited 15 times

    No. 12798. January 30, 1950. Rehearing Denied March 18, 1950. Conrad Meyer, III, New Orleans, La., Lawrence A. Molony, New Orleans, La., for petitioner. I.J. Gromfine, Attorney, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nat. Labor Relations Bd., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and HOLMES and McCORD, Circuit Judges. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. While the order sought to be enforced contains provisions ordering the respondent to cease

  8. National Labor Rel. Board v. West Ohio Gas Co.

    172 F.2d 685 (6th Cir. 1949)   Cited 11 times

    No. 10766. February 21, 1949. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board, petitioner, for enforcement of its order finding that the West Ohio Gas Company, respondent, had coerced its employees in exercise of their rights under the National Labor Relations Act, that it had discriminated by discharging certain employee for union activities, that it had raised wages to forestall union organization, and had threatened economic reprisal against employees active in union. Petition for enforcement denied

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Valley Broadcast

    189 F.2d 582 (6th Cir. 1951)   Cited 8 times

    No. 11212. June 1, 1951. Louis Schwartz, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Louis Schwartz, and Robert G. Johnson, Washington, D.C., on the brief. Carl A. Weinman, Steubenville, Ohio, for respondent. Carl A. Weinman, Berkman, Weinman Anglin, Steubenville, Ohio, Allen H. Berkman, Robert Engel, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief. Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges. HICKS, Chief Judge. Petition of the National Labor Relations

  10. Section 159 - Representatives and elections

    29 U.S.C. § 159   Cited 2,433 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Granting a bargaining unit the exclusive right to represent employees in it