§

Reed & Prince Manufacturing Co.

96 N.L.R.B. 850 (N.L.R.B. 1951)
Reed & Prince Manufacturing Co.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 534 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

  2. Labor Board v. Crompton Mills

    337 U.S. 217 (1949)   Cited 102 times
    Holding unlawful unilateral changes significantly different from "any which the employer has proposed" during bargaining

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Whittier Mills Co.

    111 F.2d 474 (5th Cir. 1940)   Cited 67 times
    Interpreting Virginian Railway's holding as “[w]here with fair opportunity to all members of the unit to vote, a majority do vote, they are, so to speak, a quorum to settle the matter, and the majority of that quorum binds those not voting, and suffices to select the bargaining representative of the unit”

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Andrew Jergens Co.

    175 F.2d 130 (9th Cir. 1949)   Cited 45 times

    No. 12051. May 17, 1949. Rehearing Denied June 24, 1949. Petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board against the Andrew Jergens Company directing respondent to cease and desist from refusing to bargain collectively with the union. Order of the Board enforced. David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Ruth Weyand, Asst. Gen. Counsel and Thomas J. McDermott, Attorney, National Labor

  5. Kansas Milling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    185 F.2d 413 (10th Cir. 1950)   Cited 36 times

    No. 4036. November 9, 1950. Rehearing Denied December 11, 1950. George Siefkin, Wichita, Kan. (Carl T. Smith, Wichita, Kan., on the brief), for petitioner. Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, Washington D.C., and Leonard S. Kimmell, Cincinnati, Ohio, on the brief), for respondent. Before BRATTON, HUXMAN and PICKETT, Circuit Judges. HUXMAN, Circuit Judge. This case is here on the petition of the Kansas Milling

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed Prince MFG

    118 F.2d 874 (1st Cir. 1941)   Cited 39 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Reed Prince Mfg. Co., 1 Cir., 118 F.2d 874, certiorari denied 313 U.S. 595, 61 S.Ct. 1119, 85 L.Ed. 1549, it was held that an employer's insistence on a provision in a contract with a bargaining agent, that during the period of the contract or at any future time the employees and the union would not request or demand a closed shop agreement or check-off system, warranted the National Labor Relations Board in inferring that the employer was not actuated by a genuine desire to reach an accord with the bargaining representative.

  7. M.H. Ritzwoller Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    114 F.2d 432 (7th Cir. 1940)   Cited 29 times

    No. 7080. May 8, 1940. On Petition for Rehearing July 16, 1940. Petition for Review of Order and Request from Enforcement of Order of National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the M.H. Ritzwoller Company to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board, wherein the Board in answer to the petition requested enforcement of its order. Petition denied and request for enforcement allowed in accordance with opinion modifying order. Otto A. Jaburek and Frank C. Jaburek, both of Chicago