ยง

R. J. Liberto, Inc.

235 N.L.R.B. 1450 (N.L.R.B. 1978)
R. J. Liberto, Inc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 709 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. I.A. of M. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 72 (1940)   Cited 316 times
    In International Ass'n of Machinists v. N.L.R.B., 1940, 311 U.S. 72, 61 S.Ct. 83, 85 L. Ed. 50, there had been a long history of management favoritism to the established and hostility to the aspiring union; and in Franks Bros. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 1944, 321 U.S. 702, 703, 64 S.Ct. 817, 818, 88 L.Ed. 1020, the employer had "conducted an aggressive campaign against the Union, even to the extent of threatening to close its factory if the union won the election."

  3. Jeannette Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    532 F.2d 916 (3d Cir. 1976)   Cited 25 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Sustaining the Board's finding that the employer's rule broadly prohibiting wage discussions was an unfair labor practice under ยง 8, reasoning that "wage discussions can be protected activity and that an employer's unqualified rule barring such discussions has the tendency to inhibit such activity"

  4. Federal Prescription Service, v. N.L.R.B

    496 F.2d 813 (8th Cir. 1974)   Cited 8 times

    Nos. 73-1362, 73-1420. Submitted January 14, 1974. Decided May 1, 1974. As Modified on Denial of Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc June 6, 1974. George S. Leonard, Washington, D.C., for petitioners. Judith Wilkenfeld, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Russell Woody, Chicago, Ill., for intervenors. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Before Van OOSTERHOUT, Senior Circuit Judge, and LAY and STEPHENSON, Circuit Judges. STEPHENSON, Circuit Judge. These