Pullman Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Burnup Sims

    379 U.S. 21 (1964)   Cited 106 times   21 Legal Analyses
    Finding violation of ยง 8 "whatever the employer's motive"
  2. Harvey Aluminum

    335 F.2d 749 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 44 times
    In Harvey Aluminum, the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB") issued a complaint charging that the petitioners engaged in unfair labor practice by maintaining surveillance of union activities of employees of Harvey Aluminum, Inc. ("Harvey") and General Engineering, Inc. ("General").
  3. Trailmobile Division, Pullman Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    379 F.2d 419 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 22 times

    No. 23271. June 21, 1967. Charles M. Lanier, New Orleans, La., Hulse Hays, Jr., John R. Phillips, Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner, Taft, Stettinius Hollister, Cincinnati, Ohio, Phelps, Dunbar, Marks, Claverie Sims, New Orleans, La., of counsel. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, George B. Driesen, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. James E. Youngdahl, Little Rock, Ark., for

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Plastic Applicators, Inc.

    369 F.2d 495 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 4 times

    No. 22646. December 2, 1966. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Peter Giesey, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., for petitioner. Richard C. Keenan, New Orleans, La., Rene A. Pastorek, Gretna, La., Kullman Lang, New Orleans, La., for Plastic Applicators, Inc. Before RIVES, WISDOM and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges. RIVES, Circuit Judge. The Board petitions for enforcement of its order

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Trinity Valley Iron and Steel Co.

    290 F.2d 47 (5th Cir. 1961)   Cited 6 times

    No. 18553. May 2, 1961. Melvin Pollack, Atty., Marcel Mallet Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Peter M. Giesey, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. John Edward Price, Brown, Herman, Scott Young, Fort Worth, Tex., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and HUTCHESON and BROWN, Circuit Judges. JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge. On June 8 the Employees commenced an economic strike. On June 30, from conduct occurring