§

Producers Cooperative Association

173 N.L.R.B. 1 (N.L.R.B. 1968)
Producers Cooperative Association

16 Cited authorities

  1. Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board

    313 U.S. 146 (1941)   Cited 294 times
    In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Tennessee Packers, Inc.

    379 F.2d 172 (6th Cir. 1967)   Cited 77 times
    Hearing on objections is required only if substantial factual questions are raised by objections

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Air Ctrl. Prod. of St. Petersburg

    335 F.2d 245 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 53 times

    No. 21017. July 28, 1964. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Lawrence Gold, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Stephen B. Goldberg, Paula Omansky, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Harrison C. Thompson, Jr., Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings, Glos Evans, Tampa, Fla., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, BROWN, Circuit Judge, and BREWSTER, District Judge. JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge. This is another § 8(a)(5), 29

  4. N.L.R.B. v. O.K. Van Storage, Inc.

    297 F.2d 74 (5th Cir. 1961)   Cited 50 times
    In NLRB v. O.K. Van Storage, Inc., (5 Cir. 1961) 297 F.2d 74, 76, the necessity for granting a hearing on objections to an election was under consideration.

  5. United States Rubber Company v. N.L.R.B

    373 F.2d 602 (5th Cir. 1967)   Cited 39 times

    No. 23208. February 20, 1967. Theo F. Weiss, San Antonio, Tex., Seymour Swerdlow, New York City, for petitioner, Clemens, Knight, Weiss Spencer, San Antonio, Tex., Arthur, Dry, Kalish, Taylor Wood, New York City, of counsel. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Glen M. Bendixen, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Warren M. Laddon, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before WISDOM, COLEMAN and GODBOLD, Circuit

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Ideal Laundry Dry Cleaning Co.

    330 F.2d 712 (10th Cir. 1964)   Cited 34 times
    In NLRB v. Ideal Laundry Dry Cleaning Co., 10 Cir., 330 F.2d 712, this court held that when an employer had not been granted an opportunity for a full hearing during the interlocutory administrative procedures on the issue of the appropriateness of the bargaining unit such issue was open in the unfair practice hearing and thereafter on review in this court.

  7. Neuhoff Brothers, Packers, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    362 F.2d 611 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 25 times

    No. 22917. June 17, 1966. Fritz L. Lyne, Lyne, Blanchette, Smith Shelton, George C. Dunlap, Dallas, Tex., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, George B. Driesen, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Peter Giesey, Atty., N.L.R.B., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, RIVES, Circuit Judge, and CHOATE, District Judge. TUTTLE, Chief Judge: This is a petition brought by the company to set aside an order of the National Labor

  8. Follett Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    397 F.2d 91 (7th Cir. 1968)   Cited 20 times

    No. 16221. June 10, 1968. Robert C. Claus, James S. Petrie, John P. Jacoby, Chicago, Ill., Vedder, Price, Kaufman Kammholz, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for petitioners. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, George B. Driesen, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Fred R. Kimmel, Atty., N.L.R.B., for respondent. Before CASTLE, Chief Judge, and SWYGERT and CUMMINGS, Circuit Judges. SWYGERT, Circuit Judge. Follett Corporation

  9. Baumritter Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    386 F.2d 117 (1st Cir. 1967)   Cited 17 times
    Explaining that inaccuracies are indigenous to campaign propaganda in the labor relations milieu

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Krieger-Ragsdale Company

    379 F.2d 517 (7th Cir. 1967)   Cited 16 times

    No. 15926. May 25, 1967. Rehearing Denied August 8, 1967. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Peter M. Giesey, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, George B. Driesen, Peter M. Giesey, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Richard F. Watt, Eugene Cotton, Drew S. Days III, Cotton, Watt, Jones King, Chicago, Ill., for intervenor. Arthur R. Donovan, Joseph A. Yocum, Evansville, Ind., Martin J. Burns, Chicago, Ill., Harry P. Dees, Joseph