§

PPG Aerospace Industries

355 N.L.R.B. 103 (N.L.R.B. 2010)
PPG Aerospace Industries

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,033 times   65 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 321 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct

  3. Laurel Baye Healthcare of Lake Lanier, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    564 F.3d 469 (D.C. Cir. 2009)   Cited 30 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that two-member NLRB cannot issue decisions

  4. Snell Island SNF LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    568 F.3d 410 (2d Cir. 2009)   Cited 19 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Snell Island SNF LLC v. National Labor Relations Board, 568 F.3d 410 (2d Cir. 2009), we held that two Board members may exercise the Board's authority in such circumstances as a quorum of a three-member delegate group, overridden that holding in New Process Steel, L.P. v. National Labor Relations Board, ___ U.S. ___, 130 S.Ct. 2635, ___ L.Ed.2d ___, 2010 WL 2400089 (2010).

  5. New Process Steel, L.P. v. N.L.R.B

    564 F.3d 840 (7th Cir. 2009)   Cited 15 times   4 Legal Analyses
    In New Process Steel, L.P. v. NLRB, 564 F.3d 840 (7th Cir. 2009), the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit concluded that a two-member panel of the NLRB — the same panel that adjudicated the instant case — "had authority to hear the labor dispute," id. at 848.

  6. Northeastern Land v. National Labor Relations

    560 F.3d 36 (1st Cir. 2009)   Cited 14 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Northeastern Land Services v. NLRB, 560 F.3d 36 (1st Cir. 2009), the court held that, "[t]he Board's delegation of its institutional power to a panel that ultimately consisted of a two-member quorum because of a vacancy was lawful under the plain text of section 3(b)."

  7. Narricot Indus. v. N.L.R.B

    587 F.3d 654 (4th Cir. 2009)   Cited 11 times
    Holding that two-member NLRB can issue decisions

  8. Teamsters v. N.L.R.B

    590 F.3d 849 (10th Cir. 2009)   Cited 7 times
    Applying Chevron to the Board's interpretation of its delegation authority under § 153(b)

  9. Overnite Transp. Co. v. N.L.R.B

    240 F.3d 325 (4th Cir. 2001)   Cited 2 times   2 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 99-2494, 00-1065. Argued June 8, 2000. Decided February 16, 2001. Petition for review of decision and order of National Labor Relations Board. ARGUED: Kenneth T. Lopatka, Matkov, Salzman, Madoff Gunn, Chicago, Illinois, for Overnite. William Maurice Bernstein, Senior Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for Board. Carey Robert Butsavage, Butsavage Associates, P.C., Washington, D.C., for Teamsters. ON BRIEF: Kenneth F. Sparks, Christopher A. Johlie, Matkov, Salzman, Madoff