§

Pierce Brothers Mortuaries

99 N.L.R.B. 1 (N.L.R.B. 1952)
Pierce Brothers Mortuaries

9 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 534 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Kobritz

    193 F.2d 8 (1st Cir. 1951)   Cited 43 times
    Upholding an NLRB departure from a policy of declining to assert jurisdiction, on the ground that "the Board had jurisdiction all the time"

  3. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Globe Wireless

    193 F.2d 748 (9th Cir. 1951)   Cited 42 times

    No. 12736. December 27, 1951. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Albert M. Dreyer, Attorneys, NL RB, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Gregory A. Harrison, Richard Ernst, Malcolm T. Dungan and Brobeck, Phleger Harrison, all of San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Before HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges and LEMMON, District Judge. HEALY, Circuit Judge. This matter is before us on petition of the National

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Greensboro Coca Cola Bottling Co.

    180 F.2d 840 (4th Cir. 1950)   Cited 35 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Greensboro Coca Cola Bottling Co., 4 Cir., 180 F.2d 840, 844, similar contentions were considered and determined.

  5. Olin Industries v. National Labor Rel. Board

    191 F.2d 613 (5th Cir. 1951)   Cited 26 times

    No. 13275. August 7, 1951. Benjamin E. Gordon, Boston, Mass., Gordon Epstein, Maurice Epstein and Allan Seserman, all of Boston, Mass., Samuel Leiter, Chelsea, Mass., of counsel, for petitioner. George J. Bott, Frederick U. Reel, Atty. NLRB, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Cnsl. NLRB, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Cnsl. NLRB, and Maurice Alexandre, all of Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before McCORD, RUSSELL, and RIVES, Circuit Judges. RIVES, Circuit Judge. This proceeding is here upon petition

  6. National Labor Rel. Board v. Stocker Mfg. Co.

    185 F.2d 451 (3d Cir. 1950)   Cited 26 times
    Holding that an agency is permitted to make its findings and predicate its orders upon the written record without hearing the witnesses testify

  7. National Labor Rel. Board v. Kennametal, Inc.

    182 F.2d 817 (3d Cir. 1950)   Cited 26 times

    No. 10113. Argued May 5, 1950. May 24, 1950. Mozart G. Ratner, Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Thomas McDermott, National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. William B. Paul, Pittsburgh, Pa. (John C. Hill, Paul, Lawrence Wills, Pittsburgh, Pa., on the brief), for respondent. Before MARIS, GOODRICH and HASTIE, Circuit Judges. GOODRICH, Circuit Judge. This petition for enforcement of an order

  8. National Lab. Rel. B. v. Worcester Woolen Mills

    170 F.2d 13 (1st Cir. 1948)   Cited 12 times

    No. 4346. October 4, 1948. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against Worcester Woolen Mills Corporation. Order enforced. Louis Libbin, of Washington, D.C. (David P. Findling, Ruth Weyand, and Rose Mary Filipowicz, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Howard W. Cowee, of Worcester, Mass. (Simon G. Friedman, of Worcester, Mass., on the brief), for respondent. Before MAGRUDER

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Smith Victory Corp.

    190 F.2d 56 (2d Cir. 1951)   Cited 3 times

    No. 250 Docket 21961. Argued May 3, 1951. Decided June 1, 1951. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman and John E. Jay, all of Washington, D.C., National Labor Relations Board. Saperston, McNaughton Saperston, Buffalo, N.Y., Howard T. Saperston, Buffalo, N.Y., for respondent. Before L. HAND, CHASE and FRANK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The only issue of any importance upon this motion to enforce the Board's order