§

Permanente Medical Group

332 N.L.R.B. 1143 (N.L.R.B. 2000)
Permanente Medical Group

8 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Insurance Agents

    361 U.S. 477 (1960)   Cited 324 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, subject to the duty to bargain in good faith, "parties should have wide latitude in their negotiations"

  2. Emporium Capwell Co. v. Western Addition Community Organization

    420 U.S. 50 (1975)   Cited 125 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that wildcat strikers are bargaining separately and are therefore not protected by the NLRA

  3. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 269 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

  4. N.L.R.B. v. General Electric Company

    418 F.2d 736 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 63 times
    Offering better terms to union locals while bargaining with the unions' national bargaining representative

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Pratt & Whitney Air Craft Division, United Technologies Corp.

    789 F.2d 121 (2d Cir. 1986)   Cited 33 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer statement that the union was "thoughtless and irresponsible" and that it was on "a collision course" was neither coercive nor implied that employees should abandon the union

  6. East Tennessee Baptist Hosp. v. N.L.R.B

    6 F.3d 1139 (6th Cir. 1993)   Cited 13 times

    Nos. 91-6171, 91-6294. Argued August 6, 1992. Decided October 7, 1993. E.H. Rayson, John B. Rayson (argued and briefed), Warren L. Gooch, Kramer, Rayson, McVeigh, Leake Rodgers, Knoxville, TN, for East Tennessee Baptist Hosp. Collis Suzanne Stocking (briefed), Magdalena Revuelta (argued), N.L.R.B., Office of the General Counsel, Washington, DC, Martin M. Arlook, Director, N.L.R.B., Region 10, Atlanta, GA, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Appellate Court Branch, Washington

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Wallkill Valley General Hosp

    866 F.2d 632 (3d Cir. 1989)   Cited 13 times
    Noting that the Board has “observed that there is a clear distinction between union membership and majority support for collective bargaining representatives”

  8. AMF Bowling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    977 F.2d 141 (4th Cir. 1992)   Cited 4 times

    Nos. 91-2553, 91-2596 and 91-2597. Argued April 6, 1992. Decided October 5, 1992. R. Daniel Bordoni, Bond, Schoeneck King, Syracuse, N.Y., argued (W. Carter Younger, McGuire, Woods, Battle Boothe, Richmond, Va., on brief), for petitioner. James R. LaVaute, Blitman King, Syracuse, N.Y., Joseph A. Oertel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., argued (Jerry M. Hunter, Gen. Counsel, D. Randall Frye, Acting Deputy Gen. Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Peter Winkler, on brief), for respondent