§

Permacold Industries, Inc.

147 N.L.R.B. 885 (N.L.R.B. 1964)
Permacold Industries, Inc.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board

    185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 162 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Birmingham Publishing Company

    262 F.2d 2 (5th Cir. 1959)   Cited 66 times
    In NLRB v. Birmingham, supra, 262 F.2d at 6-8, an employee requested from company supervisors information on how to transfer to another union.

  3. Keener Rubber, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    326 F.2d 968 (6th Cir. 1964)   Cited 16 times

    No. 15152. January 27, 1964. Robert M. Rybolt, Canton, Ohio, Larry R. Brown, Day, Cope, Ketterer, Raley Wright, Canton, Ohio, on brief, for petitioner. Melvin H. Reifin, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief, for respondent. Before MILLER, Circuit Judge, and LEVIN and KENT, District Judges. PER CURIAM. Petitioner,

  4. Sullivan v. Boston Elevated Railway

    224 Mass. 405 (Mass. 1916)   Cited 92 times

    March 13, 1916. June 20, 1916. Present: RUGG, C.J., LORING, BRALEY, De COURCY, CROSBY, JJ. Witness, Cross-examination. Evidence, Conflicting and correcting statements. Where, in an action against a corporation operating a street railway for personal injuries sustained when the plaintiff was a passenger on a car of the defendant, the plaintiff on her direct examination describes the manner in which she was injured, and in her cross-examination there are read to the witness her own answers to interrogatories

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Crean

    326 F.2d 391 (7th Cir. 1964)   Cited 8 times

    No. 14181. January 3, 1964. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Alfred Brummel, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Melvin J. Welles, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Walter S. Davis, Milwaukee, Wis., Robertson, Hoebreckx Davis, John G. Vergeront, Milwaukee, Wis., for respondents. Before DUFFY, SCHNACKENBERG, and KNOCH, Circuit Judges. KNOCH, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board has petitioned this Court pursuant to

  6. Trumbull Asphalt Co. of Delaware v. N.L.R.B

    314 F.2d 382 (7th Cir. 1963)   Cited 5 times

    No. 13743. March 4, 1963. James F. Flanagan, Harold T. Halfpenny, Richard F. Hahn, Mary M. Shaw, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Judith Bleich Kahn, Atty., National Labor Relations Bd., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before HASTINGS, Chief Judge, and KNOCH and SWYGERT, Circuit Judges. HASTINGS, Chief Judge. This matter is before us on petition of Trumbull Asphalt

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Argentum Mining Company of Nevada

    296 F.2d 219 (9th Cir. 1961)

    No. 17253. November 8, 1961. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack and Vincent W. Bradley, Attys., for the N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. No appearance for respondent. Before POPE and JERTBERG, Circuit Judges, and JAMES M. CARTER, District Judge. PER CURIAM. This case is before the court on petition of the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order issued against respondent on October

  8. Keco Industries, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    271 F.2d 263 (6th Cir. 1959)

    No. 13746. October 22, 1959. Steer, Strauss Adair, Cincinnati, Ohio, argued by Robert J. White, Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner. Thomas J. McDermott, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Washington, D.C., argued by Christopher J. Hoey, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before MARTIN, CECIL and WEICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case today heard, upon the oral arguments and briefs of the parties, and considered upon the entire record in the case, comes before us on petition of Keco Industries, Inc., for review

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Entwistle Mfg. Co.

    120 F.2d 532 (4th Cir. 1941)   Cited 15 times

    No. 4770. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce its order against the Entwistle Manufacturing Company. Order modified and enforced. Walter B. Wilbur, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Sylvester Garrett, and William Stix, all of Washington, D.C., Attys

  10. Marquandt v. Boston Y.W.C.A

    184 N.E. 287 (Mass. 1933)   Cited 21 times

    November 16, 1932. February 13, 1933. Present: RUGG, C.J., PIERCE, FIELD, LUMMUS, JJ. Agency, Scope of authority. Evidence, Presumptions and burden of proof. At the trial of an action against a corporation for breach of a contract to sell certain second hand machinery to the plaintiff, there was evidence that the plaintiff made to the defendant's engineer an offer of $200 for the machinery; that the engineer replied that he would have to find out "whether that was all right"; that, after telephoning