Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Los Angeles

6 Cited authorities

Radio Officers v. Labor Board
347 U.S. 17 (1954) Cited 470 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"
Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board
324 U.S. 793 (1945) Cited 494 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."
Labor Board v. Babcock Wilcox Co.
351 U.S. 105 (1956) Cited 294 times 19 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot
Labor Board v. Steelworkers
357 U.S. 357 (1958) Cited 72 times
In United Steelworkers, the Court warned that the NLRA "does not command that labor organizations as a matter of abstract law, under all circumstances, be protected in the use of every possible means of reaching the minds of individual workers, nor that they are entitled to use a medium of communication simply because the employer is using it."
United Fireworks Mfg. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.
252 F.2d 428 (6th Cir. 1958) Cited 35 times
No. 13343. March 5, 1958. Lloyd H. O'Hara, Dayton, Ohio (Curtner, Brenton O'Hara, Dayton, Ohio, Frederick W. Howell, Dayton, Ohio, on the brief), for petitioner. Robert E. Manuel, Washington, D.C. (Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevot, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Attys., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent. Before MARTIN, MILLER and STEWART, Circuit Judges. SHACKELFORD MILLER, JR., Circuit Judge. This case is before
Welch Scientific Company v. N.L.R.B
340 F.2d 199 (2d Cir. 1965) Cited 24 times
In Welch Scientific Co. v. NLRB, 340 F.2d 199 (2 Cir. 1965), neither the Trial Examiner's report nor the Board's decision referred to the three-fold criteria, and the Board's brief in this court sought to justify the order as to interrogation only on the basis of lack of any proper purpose.

Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co. of Los Angeles

6 Cited authorities

Radio Officers v. Labor Board

Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

Labor Board v. Babcock Wilcox Co.

Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot

Labor Board v. Steelworkers

United Fireworks Mfg. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

Welch Scientific Company v. N.L.R.B

In Welch Scientific Co. v. NLRB, 340 F.2d 199 (2 Cir. 1965), neither the Trial Examiner's report nor the Board's decision referred to the three-fold criteria, and the Board's brief in this court sought to justify the order as to interrogation only on the basis of lack of any proper purpose.