ยง

Peerless Food Products, Inc.

231 N.L.R.B. 530 (N.L.R.B. 1977)
Peerless Food Products, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. H. K. Porter Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    397 U.S. 99 (1970)   Cited 222 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB is "without power to compel a company or a union to agree to any substantive contractual provision of a collective-bargaining agreement."

  2. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under ยง 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."

  3. Hess Oil Chemical Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    415 F.2d 440 (5th Cir. 1969)   Cited 22 times
    Holding "an issue concerning the construction of an appropriate unit so as to exclude certain members from that unit is not a subject for bargaining and an insistence upon it constitutes a violation" of the NLRA

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Southland Cork Company

    342 F.2d 702 (4th Cir. 1965)   Cited 17 times

    No. 9593. Argued November 6, 1964. Decided March 1, 1965. Warren M. Davison, Attorney, National Labor Relations Bd. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Provost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Paula Omansky, Atty. National Labor Relations Bd. on brief), for petitioner. George V. Gardner, Washington, D.C., (Frederick F. Holroyd, Charleston, W. Va., and Gardner, Gandal Holroyd, Washington, D.C., on brief), for respondent. Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, and BRYAN

  5. McQuay-Norris Mfg. Co. v. Natl. Labor R. Board

    116 F.2d 748 (7th Cir. 1940)   Cited 29 times

    No. 7269. December 23, 1940. Petition for Review of Order of National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by the McQuay-Norris Manufacturing Company to review an order of the National Labor Relations Board. The Board requested enforcement of its order. Request for enforcement allowed. Barnes, Hickam, Pantzer Boyd and Paul Y. Davis, all of Indianapolis, Ind. (Kurt F. Pantzer, of Indianapolis, Ind., of counsel), for petitioner. Gerhard P. Van Arkel, of Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before EVANS and