§

Patterson Steel & Forge Co.

96 N.L.R.B. 129 (N.L.R.B. 1951)
Patterson Steel & Forge Co.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Mackay Co.

    304 U.S. 333 (1938)   Cited 534 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may replace striking workers with others to carry on business so long as the employer is not guilty of unfair labor practices

  2. May Stores Co. v. Labor Board

    326 U.S. 376 (1945)   Cited 257 times
    Requiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"

  3. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    321 U.S. 678 (1944)   Cited 269 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

  4. Labor Board v. Gullett Gin Co.

    340 U.S. 361 (1951)   Cited 211 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding unemployment compensation payments not deductible from back pay award under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed Prince MFG

    118 F.2d 874 (1st Cir. 1941)   Cited 39 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Reed Prince Mfg. Co., 1 Cir., 118 F.2d 874, certiorari denied 313 U.S. 595, 61 S.Ct. 1119, 85 L.Ed. 1549, it was held that an employer's insistence on a provision in a contract with a bargaining agent, that during the period of the contract or at any future time the employees and the union would not request or demand a closed shop agreement or check-off system, warranted the National Labor Relations Board in inferring that the employer was not actuated by a genuine desire to reach an accord with the bargaining representative.

  6. Great Southern Trucking Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    127 F.2d 180 (4th Cir. 1942)   Cited 35 times
    In Great Southern Trucking Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 4 Cir., 127 F.2d 180, 185, we said: "An employer may not have a mind `hermetically sealed' against the acceptance of the proper procedure of collective bargaining in good faith; nor may an employer engage in such Fabian tactics as will practically render abortive the statutory rights of the employees."

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Suburban Lumber Co.

    121 F.2d 829 (3d Cir. 1941)   Cited 27 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Suburban Lumber Co., 3 Cir., 121 F.2d 829 (1941), the de minimis doctrine was urged to defeat the Board's jurisdiction.

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Carlisle Lumber Co.

    94 F.2d 138 (9th Cir. 1937)   Cited 28 times
    In Carlisle the court found that strikers who were discharged before the effective date of the Wagner Act were still "employees" under the Act.

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Carlisle Lumber Co.

    99 F.2d 533 (9th Cir. 1938)   Cited 21 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Carlisle Lumber Co., 99 F.2d 533, the Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit, stated (p. 539): "The word 'regular'..., means substantially the same amount of work from point of time, as the employee had received from respondent.

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Biles Coleman L. Co.

    98 F.2d 18 (9th Cir. 1938)   Cited 19 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Biles Coleman Lumber Co., 9 Cir., 98 F.2d 18, 20, it was said: "So far as concerns the enforcement of the Board's order this is a nisi prius tribunal, and the resistive respondent by its answer, rather than by brief, should raise the issue as to any allegation of the petition which is contested."