Pasco Packing Co.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Reynolds v. United States

    98 U.S. 145 (1878)   Cited 1,289 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the forfeiture doctrine requires a witness to be “absent by his [i.e., defendant's] own wrongful procurement”
  2. Labor Board v. Highland Park Co.

    341 U.S. 322 (1951)   Cited 63 times
    In Highland it was claimed that the term "national or international labor organization" as used in the National Labor Relations Act is a technical one, meaning "union", thereby excluding the CIO, which was "a federation".
  3. Wise v. Herzog

    114 F.2d 486 (D.C. Cir. 1940)   Cited 37 times
    In Wise v. Herzog, 114 F.2d 486 (D.C. Cir.) it was held that a meritorious defense need not be shown when the attack on the void judgment was by motion in the original suit.
  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Taormina

    207 F.2d 251 (5th Cir. 1953)   Cited 16 times

    No. 14362. September 17, 1953. Ruth V. Reel, Atty., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, Elizabeth W. Weston, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Scott Toothaker, McAllen, Tex., Ewers, Cox Toothaker, McAllen, Tex., of counsel, for respondents. Before HOLMES, BORAH, and RIVES, Circuit Judges. BORAH, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order of May 29, 1951, requiring respondents

  5. National Labor Rel. B. v. O'Keefe Merritt M

    178 F.2d 445 (9th Cir. 1949)   Cited 19 times
    Listing seven cases
  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Coca-Cola Bottling

    219 F.2d 441 (6th Cir. 1955)   Cited 5 times

    No. 12316. February 15, 1955. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Samuel M. Singer, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Skaggs, Hays Fahey, Louisville, Ky. (Argued by A. Singleton Cagle, Louisville, Ky., of counsel), for respondent. Before ALLEN, MARTIN and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case came on to be heard upon the record and briefs and oral argument of counsel: And it appearing that respondent at the hearing herein contended that W.B. Taylor, CIO Regional Director for Kentucky, is an officer

  7. Goodman Mfg. Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    227 F.2d 465 (7th Cir. 1955)   Cited 3 times

    No. 11403. November 10, 1955. Edward S. Stern, Charles Aaron, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner, Aaron Aaron Schimberg Hess, Chicago, Ill., of counsel. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Rosanna A. Blake, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, Chicago, Ill., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before MAJOR, LINDLEY, and SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judges. MAJOR, Circuit Judge. This is a petition

  8. Eureka Lake Company v. Yuba County

    116 U.S. 410 (1886)   Cited 21 times

    ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Submitted December 21, 1885. Decided January 18, 1886. When the court may reasonably infer from the record in a case brought here by writ of error from a State court that the Federal question raised here was necessarily involved in the decision there, the court will not dismiss the writ on motion to dismiss for want of jurisdiction, although it may not appear affirmatively on the record that the question was raised there. When a court, having