PARSONS ELECTRIC LLC

9 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Canning
573 U.S. 513 (2014) Cited 268 times 150 Legal Analyses
Holding that because there was no quorum of validly appointed board members, the NLRB “lacked authority to act,” and the enforcement order was therefore “void ab initio ”
Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 708 times 29 Legal Analyses
Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
460 U.S. 693 (1983) Cited 309 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights
Department of the Navy, Marine Corps Logistics Base v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
962 F.2d 48 (D.C. Cir. 1992) Cited 44 times 2 Legal Analyses
Outlining FLRA position
Mississippi Power Co. v. N.L.R.B
284 F.3d 605 (5th Cir. 2002) Cited 15 times
Describing the competing standards
N.L.R.B. v. Pan American Grain Co., Inc.
432 F.3d 69 (1st Cir. 2005) Cited 4 times
Noting that the court did not "understand the [NLRB's] rationale" and that while the Board's "result may or may not be sound, . . . until we understand its basis, we cannot effectively review it"
Allied Mechanical Services, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
113 F.3d 623 (6th Cir. 1997) Cited 6 times
Nos. 96-5208/5332/5411 Argued March 17, 1997. Decided and Filed May 16, 1997 Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 24 Gary A. Chamberlin (briefed), Miller, Johnson, Snell Cumminskey, Grand Rapids, MI, Barry R. Smith (argued and briefed), Miller, Johnson, Snell Cumminskey, Kalamazoo, MI, for Petitioners/Cross-Respondents. Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Asso. Gen. Counsel, Peter Winkler (briefed), National Labor Relations Board, Appellate Court Branch, Meredith L. Jason (argued and briefed), National Labor Relations
Litton Microwave Cooking Products v. N.L.R.B
868 F.2d 854 (6th Cir. 1989) Cited 13 times 1 Legal Analyses
Stating that courts "will not normally disturb the credibility assessments of the [ARB] or an administrative law judge, `who has observed the demeanor of the witnesses'"
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,084 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

PARSONS ELECTRIC LLC

9 Cited authorities

Holding that because there was no quorum of validly appointed board members, the NLRB “lacked authority to act,” and the enforcement order was therefore “void ab initio ”

Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

Outlining FLRA position

Describing the competing standards

Noting that the court did not "understand the [NLRB's] rationale" and that while the Board's "result may or may not be sound, . . . until we understand its basis, we cannot effectively review it"

Stating that courts "will not normally disturb the credibility assessments of the [ARB] or an administrative law judge, `who has observed the demeanor of the witnesses'"

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"