Palo Alto Research Center Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. SAS Inst. Inc. v. Iancu

    138 S. Ct. 1348 (2018)   Cited 259 times   140 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the word "any" carries "an expansive meaning"
  2. Turner v. the President, Directors, of Bank of North-Am

    4 U.S. 8 (1799)   Cited 189 times
    Noting that subject matter jurisdiction is presumed for courts of general jurisdiction unless proved otherwise
  3. Section 112 - Specification

    35 U.S.C. § 112   Cited 7,350 times   1045 Legal Analyses
    Requiring patent applications to include a "specification" that provides, among other information, a written description of the invention and of the manner and process of making and using it
  4. Section 103 - Conditions for patentability; non-obvious subject matter

    35 U.S.C. § 103   Cited 6,124 times   478 Legal Analyses
    Holding the party seeking invalidity must prove "the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains."
  5. Section 314 - Institution of inter partes review

    35 U.S.C. § 314   Cited 375 times   632 Legal Analyses
    Directing our attention to the Director's decision whether to institute inter partes review "under this chapter" rather than "under this section"