§

Pallet Companies, Inc., a subsidiary of IFCO Systems N.A., Inc.

361 N.L.R.B. 339 (N.L.R.B. 2014)
Pallet Companies, Inc., a subsidiary of IFCO Systems N.A., Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Canning

    573 U.S. 513 (2014)   Cited 268 times   150 Legal Analyses
    Holding that because there was no quorum of validly appointed board members, the NLRB “lacked authority to act,” and the enforcement order was therefore “void ab initio ”

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Union, Local 23

    484 U.S. 112 (1987)   Cited 347 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a federal court has no authority to review a decision of the NLRB's General Counsel dismissing an unfair labor practice complaint pursuant to an informal settlement in which the charging party refused to join

  3. Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board

    313 U.S. 146 (1941)   Cited 293 times
    In Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. F. L. A.

    613 F.3d 275 (D.C. Cir. 2010)   Cited 2 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 09-1119, 09-1148. Argued January 21, 2010. Decided July 23, 2010. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the Federal Labor Relations Authority. Howard S. Scher, Attorney, U.S. Department of Justice, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were William G. Kanter, Attorney, and Ronald E. Meisburg, General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board. Rosa M. Koppel, Solicitor, Federal Labor Relations Authority, argued the cause for respondent. With

  5. N.L.R.B. v. St. Clair Die Casting, L.L.C

    423 F.3d 843 (8th Cir. 2005)   Cited 5 times
    Affirming the Board's finding that workers were not supervisors where there "was evidence ... that the setup specialists did not have independent authority to assign operators their initial tasks or to prioritize the work to be done on the shift"

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Burnett Construction Company

    350 F.2d 57 (10th Cir. 1965)   Cited 15 times

    No. 8039. August 6, 1965. Melvin H. Reifin, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Warren M. Davidson, Atty., N.L.R.B., with him on the brief), for petitioner. Harold B. Wagner, Denver, Colo., for respondent. Before PHILLIPS, PICKETT and LEWIS, Circuit Judges. PICKETT, Circuit Judge. This proceeding is here on the Board's petition for enforcement of its order directing respondent to cease and desist

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Commerce Co.

    328 F.2d 600 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 12 times

    No. 20477. March 3, 1964. Rehearing Denied March 30, 1964. Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Solomon I. Hirsh, Paula Omansky, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Charles R. Vickery, Jr., Liddell, Austin, Dawson Sapp, Houston, Tex., Harley W. McConnell, Houston, Tex., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON and GRIFFIN B. BELL, Circuit Judges, and BREWSTER, District Judge. HUTCHESON, Circuit

  8. Section 153 - National Labor Relations Board

    29 U.S.C. § 153   Cited 381 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Establishing National Labor Relations Board with an explicit removal limitation