Ozburn-Hessey Logistics, LLC

4 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  2. ITT Industries, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    413 F.3d 64 (D.C. Cir. 2005)   Cited 6 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Describing the "inherent tension" between these interests (quoting Hillhaven , 336 N.L.R.B. at 650 )
  3. First Healthcare Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    344 F.3d 523 (6th Cir. 2003)   Cited 6 times   2 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 01-2478, 01-2673. Argued: April 29, 2003. Decided and Filed: September 19, 2003. Petition for Rehearing Denied En Banc: December 2, 2003. Pursuant to Sixth Circuit Rule 206 Appeal from the Court of Appeals, Clay, Circuit Judge. John V. Nordlund (argued and briefed), Fairfax, California, Leslie M. Mitchell (briefed), Law Office of Leslie Mitchell, Sacramento, California, for Petitioner. Jill Griffin (argued and briefed), Aileen A. Armstrong (briefed), Frederick C. Havard (briefed), National Labor

  4. N.L.R.B. v. M B Headwear Co.

    349 F.2d 170 (4th Cir. 1965)   Cited 21 times
    Stating that a "substantial evidence" challenge presented a "familiar question"