§

Overnite Transportation Co.

330 N.L.R.B. 1275 (N.L.R.B. 2000)
Overnite Transportation Co.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 730 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 709 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  3. First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    452 U.S. 666 (1981)   Cited 268 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 263 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  5. W.W. Grainger, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    860 F.2d 244 (7th Cir. 1988)   Cited 30 times
    In W.W. Grainger, Inc. v. NLRB, 860 F.2d 244, 247 (6th Cir. 1988), the court stated that the factual question of whether two employers are joint depends on factors such as "the supervision of the employees' day-to-day activities, authority to hire or fire employees, promulgation of work rules and conditions of employment, work assignments, and issuance of operating instructions."

  6. Olivetti Office U.S.A., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    926 F.2d 181 (2d Cir. 1991)   Cited 25 times
    Denying enforcement of Board order that would serve no legitimate purpose

  7. Furniture Rentors of America, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    36 F.3d 1240 (3d Cir. 1994)   Cited 16 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that employer was not required to bargain over subcontracting because decision was based on reduced productivity, damaged product, customer complaints, and employee theft rather than labor costs

  8. Dorsey Trailers v. National Labor Relations

    134 F.3d 125 (3d Cir. 1998)   Cited 10 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 96-3392 and 96-3578. Argued June 26, 1997. Filed January 13, 1998. Michael S. Mitchell, Esq., Robert E. Larkin, III, Esq., Fisher Phillips, 201 St. Charles Avenue, Suite 3710, New Orleans, Louisiana 70170, Attorneys for Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, Dorsey Trailers. Robert J. Englehart, Esq., Charles P. Donnelly, Esq., Aileen A. Armstrong, Esq., National Labor Relations Board, 1099 14th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20570, Attorney for Respondent/Cross Petitioner, National Labor Relations Board

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wehr Constructors, Inc.

    159 F.3d 946 (6th Cir. 1998)   Cited 6 times
    In Wehr we observed: "As Fibreboard and First National Maintenance make clear, a decision to subcontract is not necessarily subject to mandatory collective bargaining; whether such bargaining is mandatory can only be answered by looking to the particular facts presented in the individual case."

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Plymouth Stamping Division, Eltec Corp.

    870 F.2d 1112 (6th Cir. 1989)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that company’s decision to transfer and subcontract its parts assembly operation was a mandatory bargaining subject because the transfer did not significantly alter the nature of the company’s business, company incurred no significant capital expenditures, and transfer occurred shortly after company unsuccessfully sought economic concessions from the union