§

One Stop Kosher Supermarket

355 N.L.R.B. 1237 (N.L.R.B. 2010)
One Stop Kosher Supermarket

10 Cited authorities

  1. International Union

    459 F.2d 1329 (D.C. Cir. 1972)   Cited 118 times
    Holding that where a “judge plays a role in suppression of the evidence, the force of [any adverse] inference is dissipated”

  2. Strand Theatre v. N.L.R.B

    493 F.3d 515 (5th Cir. 2007)   Cited 20 times
    Holding that presenting a union with a ` fait accompli . . . unilaterally inform[ing] the [u]nion that position had already been eliminated" violated a union's right to bargaining provided by the Act

  3. E.C. Waste, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    359 F.3d 36 (1st Cir. 2004)   Cited 23 times
    Holding suspicious timing and "myriad violations of § 8" was substantial evidence supporting Board's finding of animus

  4. Conley v. N.L.R.B

    520 F.3d 629 (6th Cir. 2008)   Cited 13 times
    Finding anti-union animus when employer terminated an employee for previously tolerated conduct

  5. Laro Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    56 F.3d 224 (D.C. Cir. 1995)   Cited 23 times
    Inferring discriminatory motive from, inter alia, an employer's professed desire to hire the best qualified workers and the employer's subsequent decision to hire employees with no relevant experience over union members with experience

  6. In re South African Apartheid Litigation

    633 F. Supp. 2d 117 (S.D.N.Y. 2009)   Cited 8 times

    Nos. 02 MDL 1499 (SAS), 03 Civ. 4524 (SAS). June 25, 2009. Michael D. Hausfeld, Esq., Hausfeld LLP, Washington, DC, Steig D. Olson, Esq., New York, NY, Matt Schultz, Esq., Levin Papantonio Thomas Mitchell Echsner Proctor, P.A., Pensacola, FL, Robert G. Kerrigan, Esq., Kerrigan, Estess, Rankin McLeod, LLP, for Plaintiffs Balintulo et al. Michael Gerard, Esq., Mark David McPherson, Esq., Morrison Foerster, New York, NY, Jack W. Londen, Esq., Peter J. Stern, Esq., Morrison Foerster, LLP, Chiyodaku,

  7. Holo-Krome Company v. N.L.R.B

    954 F.2d 108 (2d Cir. 1992)   Cited 23 times
    Denying petition for rehearing

  8. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Dillon Stores

    643 F.2d 687 (10th Cir. 1981)   Cited 21 times
    Finding that the employer's proffer of "a flimsy or unsupported explanation may affirmatively suggest that the employer has seized upon a pretext to mask an antiunion motivation"

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Oklahoma Installation Co.

    219 F.3d 1160 (10th Cir. 2000)   Cited 2 times
    Concluding that the contract language at issue did not clearly express the parties' intent, without addressing actual employee support