Oberthur Technologies

32 Cited authorities

Ohio v. Roberts
448 U.S. 56 (1980) Cited 4,650 times 16 Legal Analyses
Holding that the question of good-faith effort is a question of reasonableness, and a prosecutor is not required to do a futile act
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Canning
573 U.S. 513 (2014) Cited 268 times 150 Legal Analyses
Holding that because there was no quorum of validly appointed board members, the NLRB “lacked authority to act,” and the enforcement order was therefore “void ab initio ”
Allentown Mack Sales & Service, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
522 U.S. 359 (1998) Cited 424 times 13 Legal Analyses
Holding that the Board "is not free to prescribe what inferences from the evidence it will accept and reject, but must draw all those inferences that the evidence fairly demands"
Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 708 times 29 Legal Analyses
Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. Weingarten, Inc.
420 U.S. 251 (1975) Cited 431 times 64 Legal Analyses
Holding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness
Labor Board v. Columbian Co.
306 U.S. 292 (1939) Cited 993 times
Defining substantial evidence
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.
385 U.S. 432 (1967) Cited 263 times 4 Legal Analyses
Approving "discovery-type standard"
Linden Lumber Division, Summer & Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
419 U.S. 301 (1974) Cited 55 times 11 Legal Analyses
Recognizing "that while the election process has acknowledged superiority in ascertaining whether a union has majority support, [signed employee authorization] cards may adequately reflect employee sentiment"
Regal Cinemas, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
317 F.3d 300 (D.C. Cir. 2003) Cited 30 times
Affirming the Board's finding of a Section 8 violation where the layoff was motivated by labor costs rather than technological advances
Fallbrook Hosp. Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
785 F.3d 729 (D.C. Cir. 2015) Cited 10 times
Upholding relief to CNA for Fallbrook's refusal to bargain in good faith
Section 706 - Scope of review
5 U.S.C. § 706 Cited 20,782 times 227 Legal Analyses
Granting courts jurisdiction to "compel agency action unlawfully held or unreasonably delayed"
Section 158 - Unfair labor practices
29 U.S.C. § 158 Cited 10,304 times 84 Legal Analyses
Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,084 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Oberthur Technologies

32 Cited authorities

Holding that the question of good-faith effort is a question of reasonableness, and a prosecutor is not required to do a futile act

Holding that because there was no quorum of validly appointed board members, the NLRB “lacked authority to act,” and the enforcement order was therefore “void ab initio ”

Holding that the Board "is not free to prescribe what inferences from the evidence it will accept and reject, but must draw all those inferences that the evidence fairly demands"

Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

Holding that an employer commits an unfair labor practice by compelling an employee to attend an investigatory meeting that could lead to discipline without allowing the employee to bring a union witness

Defining substantial evidence

Approving "discovery-type standard"

Recognizing "that while the election process has acknowledged superiority in ascertaining whether a union has majority support, [signed employee authorization] cards may adequately reflect employee sentiment"

Affirming the Board's finding of a Section 8 violation where the layoff was motivated by labor costs rather than technological advances

Upholding relief to CNA for Fallbrook's refusal to bargain in good faith

Granting courts jurisdiction to "compel agency action unlawfully held or unreasonably delayed"

Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"