Nob Hill General Stores, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    460 U.S. 693 (1983)   Cited 309 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 263 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"
  3. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith
  4. Monmouth Care Ctr. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    672 F.3d 1085 (D.C. Cir. 2012)   Cited 7 times
    Declining to overturn administrative law judge's credibility determination “based on a combination of testimonial demeanor and a lack of specificity and internal corroboration”
  5. San Diego Newspaper Guild, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    548 F.2d 863 (9th Cir. 1977)   Cited 50 times
    Rejecting a union's claim for information when the CBA was not up for renewal for two years and there was no evidence of contract negotiations
  6. N.L.R.B. v. U.S. Postal Serv

    486 F.3d 683 (10th Cir. 2007)   Cited 11 times
    Holding injunctions that broadly order the enjoined party simply to obey the law and not violate the statute are generally impermissible
  7. West Penn Power Co. v. N.L.R.B

    394 F.3d 233 (4th Cir. 2005)   Cited 4 times

    Nos. 03-1984, 03-2139. Argued: June 3, 2004. Decided: January 12, 2005. Petition for review of National Labor Relations Board. ARGUED: John Clark Unkovic, Reed Smith, L.L.P., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, for West Penn Power Company, Potomac Edison Power Company, and Allegheny Energy Service Corporation. Joan Elizabeth Hoyte, Office of the General, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for the Board. Burton E. Rosenthal, Segal, Roitman Coleman, Boston, Massachusetts, for Intervenor. ON BRIEF:

  8. N.L.R.B. v. U.S. Postal Service

    18 F.3d 1089 (3d Cir. 1994)   Cited 5 times
    Noting that presumptively relevant information includes "[i]nformation about the terms and conditions of employment" and "is required to be produced"