§

Nicholson Terminal & Dock Company

369 N.L.R.B. 147 (N.L.R.B. 2020)
Nicholson Terminal & Dock Company

8 Cited authorities

  1. Mastro Plastics Corp. v. Labor Board

    350 U.S. 270 (1956)   Cited 403 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that collective-bargaining agreement "must be read as a whole and in light of the law relating to it when it was made"

  2. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 494 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Town & Country Electric, Inc.

    516 U.S. 85 (1995)   Cited 85 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding "employee," as defined by the NLRA, "does not exclude paid union organizers"

  4. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    366 U.S. 667 (1961)   Cited 186 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may picket a secondary employer only when the primary employer is at the job site

  5. Guardsmark, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    475 F.3d 369 (D.C. Cir. 2007)   Cited 16 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Striking down rule that only allowed employees to complain internally

  6. T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    865 F.3d 265 (5th Cir. 2017)   Cited 3 times   2 Legal Analyses

    No. 16-60284 C/w 16-60497 07-25-2017 T-MOBILE USA, INCORPORATED, Petitioner–Cross Respondent v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent–Cross Petitioner National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner v. MetroPCS Communications, Incorporated, Respondent Paul Alfred Salvatore, Esq., Mark David Harris, Proskauer, New York, NY, Irina Constantin, Mark Theodore, Proskauer, Los Angeles, CA, Daniel Jerome Davis, Proskauer, Washington, DC, Howard Shapiro, Esq., Proskauer, New Orleans, LA, for Petitioner. Linda

  7. Minnesota Licensed Practical Nurses Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    406 F.3d 1020 (8th Cir. 2005)   Cited 2 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 03-3306. Submitted: October 21, 2004. Filed: May 11, 2005. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Harold Craig Becker, argued, Chicago, IL (Gregg M. Corwin, on the brief), for petitioner Jill A. Griffin, argued, NLRB, for Respondent. James M. Dawson, argued, Minneapolis, MN, argued on behalf of the intervenor, Alexandria Clinic, P.A., in opposition to the petitioner's petition for review. Before LOKEN, Chief Judge, MAGILL and BENTON, Circuit Judges. LOKEN, Chief Judge. The

  8. National Labor Relations Bd. v. United BHD

    184 F.2d 60 (10th Cir. 1950)   Cited 22 times

    No. 3969. August 14, 1950. Dominick L. Manoli, Washington, D.C. (Robert N. Denham, David P. Findling, and A. Norman Somers, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Clif. Langsdale, Kansas City, Mo. (John J. Manning, Kansas City, Mo., on the brief), for respondents. Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and HUXMAN, Circuit Judges. BRATTON, Circuit Judge. In presently pertinent part, section 8(b)(4)(A) of the National Labor Relations Act, 49 Stat. 449, as amended by the Labor-Management