Nichols Aluminum, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 650 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."
  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 356 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  3. Chevron Mining, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    684 F.3d 1318 (D.C. Cir. 2012)   Cited 19 times
    Reexamining precedent in light of recent Supreme Court decisions and reaching the same conclusion
  4. Southwest Merchandising Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    53 F.3d 1334 (D.C. Cir. 1995)   Cited 38 times
    Holding that the jury could infer pretext and unlawful discrimination from an employer's shifting and inconsistent explanations for its action
  5. Epilepsy Foundation of N.E. Ohio v. N.L.R.B

    268 F.3d 1095 (D.C. Cir. 2001)   Cited 20 times   4 Legal Analyses

    No. 00-1332. Argued October 2, 2001. Decided November 2, 2001. Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Anita Barondes argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs were Peter Chatilovicz, Ronald A. Lindsay, and Steven M. Moss. Maurice Baskin, Stephen A. Bokat, Robin S. Conrad, Heather L. MacDougall, Daniel V. Yager, Harold P. Coxson Jr., Burton J. Fishman, Robert J. Verdisco, Jan S. Amundson, and Quentin Riegel were on

  6. Detroit Newspaper Agency v. N.L.R.B

    435 F.3d 302 (D.C. Cir. 2006)   Cited 9 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Reversing Board finding of Wright Line prima facie case for lack of substantial evidence
  7. N.L.R.B. v. Hospital San Pablo, Inc.

    207 F.3d 67 (1st Cir. 2000)   Cited 11 times

    No. 99-1666. Heard January 7, 2000. Decided March 27, 2000. ON PETITION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF AN ORDER OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD. John D. Burgoyne, Assistant General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, with whom Frederick L. Feinstein, General Counsel, Linda Sher, Associate General Counsel, and Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, were on brief, for petitioner. Jay A. García-Gregory, with whom Tristán Reyes-Gilestra and Fiddler, Gonzalez Rodriguez, LLP were on brief

  8. Florida Steel Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    529 F.2d 1225 (5th Cir. 1976)   Cited 38 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that union membership cannot protect flagrant insubordination where the employer's discipline was not motivated by anti-union animus
  9. N.L.R.B. v. Igramo Enterprise, Inc.

    310 F. App'x 452 (2d Cir. 2009)

    Nos. 08-1861-ag (L), 08-2207-ag. February 18, 2009. Petition for review of a decision and order of the National Labor Relations Board. UPON CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the petition for review is DENIED. John Diviney (Alan B. Pearl and Siam Asad Ali, on the brief), Alan B. Pearl Associates, Syosset, NY, for Petitioner. Meredith L. Jason, Supervisory Attorney (Jeffrey L. Horowitz, Attorney, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel, John H. Ferguson

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Blue Bell

    219 F.2d 796 (5th Cir. 1955)   Cited 24 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Blue Bell Inc., 219 F.2d 796 (4) (5 Cir. 1955) a female employee wrote a letter to employer's vice-president calling him a "liar".