New York Telephone Co.

5 Cited authorities

Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board
324 U.S. 793 (1945) Cited 494 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."
N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 357 times 46 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. BASF Wyandotte Corp.
798 F.2d 849 (5th Cir. 1986) Cited 25 times
Finding that a collective bargaining agreement granting employees certain benefits under the plan while they were on "union leaves" of absence from the employer fell within the § 186(c) exception
Restaurant Corp. of America v. N.L.R.B
827 F.2d 799 (D.C. Cir. 1987) Cited 11 times
No. 85-1475. August 25, 1987. Marc B. Seidman, Atty., Robert E. Allen, Associate General Counsel, and Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on respondent's petition for rehearing. Timothy J. O'Rourke, Marshall F. Berman and Michael A. Pace, Washington, D.C., were on petitioner's response to the petition for rehearing. Petition for Review and Cross-Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before MIKVA and BORK, Circuit
Burns Electronic Security Services, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
624 F.2d 403 (2d Cir. 1980) Cited 6 times
In Burns the Court was concerned with the Board's procedural deficiencies because the Board had excluded relevant evidence in the representation proceeding and made inconsistent rulings in a prior case involving similar employees of the same employer.

New York Telephone Co.

5 Cited authorities

Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. BASF Wyandotte Corp.

Finding that a collective bargaining agreement granting employees certain benefits under the plan while they were on "union leaves" of absence from the employer fell within the § 186(c) exception

Restaurant Corp. of America v. N.L.R.B

Burns Electronic Security Services, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

In Burns the Court was concerned with the Board's procedural deficiencies because the Board had excluded relevant evidence in the representation proceeding and made inconsistent rulings in a prior case involving similar employees of the same employer.