§

Nations Rent, Inc.

342 N.L.R.B. 179 (N.L.R.B. 2004)
Nations Rent, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Shelby Memorial Hosp. Ass'n

    1 F.3d 550 (7th Cir. 1993)   Cited 27 times
    Ordering employees to remove union patches based on uniform policy not previously enforced violated § 158

  3. Elastic Stop Nut Division of Harvard Industries, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    921 F.2d 1275 (D.C. Cir. 1990)   Cited 27 times
    Holding that a reviewing court "must uphold Board-approved credibility determinations of an ALJ unless they are `hopelessly incredible' or `self-contradictory'"

  4. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176

  5. Rock-Tenn Co. v. N.L.R.B

    69 F.3d 803 (7th Cir. 1995)   Cited 14 times

    Nos. 95-1347 95-1706 ARGUED SEPTEMBER 8, 1995 DECIDED NOVEMBER 3, 1995 Larry E. Forrester (argued), James Chadwick Hatmaker, Atlanta, GA, for Rock-Tenn Company. Charles P. Donnelly, Jr., National Labor Relations Board, Contempt Litigation Branch, Washington, DC, Aileen A. Armstrong, John D. Burgoyne (argued), Steven F. Rappaport, National Labor Relations Board, Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, DC, William T. Little, National Labor Relations Board, Region 25, Indianapolis, IN,

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Trumbull Asphalt Co. of Delaware

    327 F.2d 841 (8th Cir. 1964)   Cited 31 times
    Holding that "[t]he fact of discharge . . . does not depend on the use of formal words of firing. It is sufficient if the words or actions of the employer 'would logically lead a prudent person to believe his tenure had been terminated.'"

  7. Section 362 - Automatic stay

    11 U.S.C. § 362   Cited 29,807 times   178 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that cause exists to lift the stay because no bankruptcy purpose would be served by keeping the stay in place