National Indemnity Company
3 Cited authorities
Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
437 U.S. 556 (1978) Cited 196 times 13 Legal AnalysesHolding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity
Guardsmark, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
475 F.3d 369 (D.C. Cir. 2007) Cited 16 times 2 Legal AnalysesStriking down rule that only allowed employees to complain internally
T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
865 F.3d 265 (5th Cir. 2017) Cited 3 times 2 Legal AnalysesNo. 16-60284 C/w 16-60497 07-25-2017 T-MOBILE USA, INCORPORATED, Petitioner–Cross Respondent v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent–Cross Petitioner National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner v. MetroPCS Communications, Incorporated, Respondent Paul Alfred Salvatore, Esq., Mark David Harris, Proskauer, New York, NY, Irina Constantin, Mark Theodore, Proskauer, Los Angeles, CA, Daniel Jerome Davis, Proskauer, Washington, DC, Howard Shapiro, Esq., Proskauer, New Orleans, LA, for Petitioner. Linda